Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Text edits for the CloudFormation templates #1794

Merged

Conversation

kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor

Because we can no longer use "UPI" in customer-facing documentation and the CloudFormation templates in /installer are published in /openshift-docs, I want to change the source templates instead of having to always reproduce the fix in the docs repo.

I'm making a few other style and changes to the parameter descriptions.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 28, 2019
@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wking, @cuppett PTAL?

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@cuppett
Copy link
Member

cuppett commented May 28, 2019

Good edits. Thanks!

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you, Stephen!

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jcpowermac, @jstuever, since Stephen's agreed with the change, will you +1 it and help me get it into the right locations?

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 29, 2019
@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wking, I've made some updates based on your comments. Thanks! Will you PTAL?

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

a17914c needs to have a better commit title and message.
51c26b3 needs to be squashed before merge.

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abhinavdahiya, is this acceptable?

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

@abhinavdahiya, is this acceptable?

+1

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abhinavdahiya, do you have any suggestions for getting this merged?

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

@abhinavdahiya, do you have any suggestions for getting this merged?

@wking had comments on the PR. i'll give him some time to come back and give it a second round of review.

Because we can no longer use "UPI" in customer-facing documentation and the CloudFormation templates in /installer are published in /openshift-docs, I want to change the source templates instead of having to always reproduce the fix in the docs repo.

I'm making a few other style and changes to the parameter descriptions.

Per a comment on a docs PR (openshift/openshift-docs#15059), the subnet type for the worker CloudFormation template  needs to change to PrivateSubnet from WorkerSubnet. Trevor clarified that the subnet in the worker does not need to be private. s/PrivateSubnet/Subnet in just that CloudFormation Template.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 31, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, kalexand-rh, mazzystr, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [abhinavdahiya,wking]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

19 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 273cece into openshift:master Jun 1, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@kalexand-rh: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7 e45521e link /test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh deleted the cloudformation_edits branch June 3, 2019 12:49
wking added a commit to wking/openshift-release that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2019
…i-e2e: WorkerSubnet -> Subnet

Catching up with openshift/installer@e45521e9 (Text edits for the
CloudFormation templates, 2019-05-28, openshift/installer#1794).
wking pushed a commit to wking/openshift-installer that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2019
This had some trivial conflicts in the CloudFormation templates
because e45521e (Text edits for the CloudFormation templates,
2019-05-28, openshift#1794) wasn't backported to 4.1.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants