Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gather_service_logs: Gather MCO host services #158

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Motivated by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842906
and many prior bugs. Also added a link to
openshift/machine-config-operator#1365
which I think would be a better fix for early cluster bringup.

Also xref openshift/machine-config-operator#1790

Motivated by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842906
and many prior bugs.  Also added a link to
openshift/machine-config-operator#1365
which I think would be a better fix for early cluster bringup.

Also xref openshift/machine-config-operator#1790
@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Jun 30, 2020

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 30, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, runcom
To complete the pull request process, please assign rickjwagner
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @rickjwagner in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Jun 30, 2020

ping @sferich888 can we get this in

@sferich888
Copy link
Contributor

@sanchezl can we merge this with #144 too ?

@sanchezl
Copy link
Contributor

@sanchezl can we merge this with #144 too ?

@sferich888 , @cgwalters Added to #144

@sferich888
Copy link
Contributor

@cgwalters can we close this with this being in #144?
@sanchezl your PR merged should this be closed?

@sferich888
Copy link
Contributor

@cgwalters / @sanchezl can we close this?

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 7, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Mar 9, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants