Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1872080: Updating images/Dockerfile.rhel baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config #130

Conversation

openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is autogenerated by the ocp-build-data-enforcer.
It updates the baseimages in the Dockerfile used for promotion in order to ensure it
matches the configuration in the ocp-build-data repository used
for producing release artifacts.

If you believe the content of this PR is incorrect, please contact the dptp team in
#forum-testplatform.

This PR is autogenerated by the [ocp-build-data-enforcer][1].
It updates the baseimages in the Dockerfile used for promotion in order to ensure it
matches the configuration in the [ocp-build-data repository][2] used
for producing release artifacts.

If you believe the content of this PR is incorrect, please contact the dptp team in
#forum-testplatform.

[1]: https://github.com/openshift/ci-tools/tree/master/cmd/ocp-build-data-enforcer
[2]: https://github.com/openshift/ocp-build-data/tree/openshift-4.6-rhel-8/images
@jupierce jupierce changed the title Updating images/Dockerfile.rhel baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config Bug 1872080: Updating images/Dockerfile.rhel baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config Aug 25, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 25, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1872080, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1872080: Updating images/Dockerfile.rhel baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Aug 25, 2020

/lgtm
/approve
/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Aug 25, 2020
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Aug 25, 2020

/hold

until we know whether we unify golang versions this way.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 25, 2020
@jupierce
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Aug 27, 2020

We will remove the hold as soon as the opt-out mechanism for the Golang version is available and we have opted-out.

@jupierce
Copy link
Contributor

jupierce commented Sep 1, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@jupierce
Copy link
Contributor

jupierce commented Sep 2, 2020

/retest

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Sep 3, 2020

With 1.15 there will be a new PR switching this to explicit versions, with an option to opt-out by holding that.

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 3, 2020
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Sep 3, 2020

/approve
/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

9 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

11 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

the OAS binary doesn't run because versionFromGit is not set.
The variable is set from ldflags during compilation.

the version is set by the build-machinery-go but the new image is overriding SOURCE_GIT_TAG to an empty string

see also openshift/oauth-apiserver#17 (comment)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 10, 2020
@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel
/retest

the based image was fixed by openshift-eng/ocp-build-data@fc69783

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 10, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@crawford
Copy link

From the logs:

error: unable to extract layer sha256:8eececee21b9544a4b1baf4da8e27b05873ce7da37a2131d6a95aaa76cbe891b from registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-j61bl2pm/stable@sha256:ee632e79768f3230424776c6a385699a3907f6bd704a35d17e088e1e5e1ddc62: stream error: stream ID 373; INTERNAL_ERROR

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 10, 2020

@openshift-bot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-cmd 43b2fe9 link /test e2e-cmd

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4376e14 into openshift:master Sep 10, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state.

Bugzilla bug 1872080 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1872080: Updating images/Dockerfile.rhel baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants