Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

WIP: 4.10 downstream/upstream sync - first quarter #201

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from
Closed

WIP: 4.10 downstream/upstream sync - first quarter #201

wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

njhale
Copy link
Contributor

@njhale njhale commented Oct 13, 2021 •
edited
Loading

timflannagan and others added 15 commits October 13, 2021 14:54
@timflannagan @njhale
.github/workflows: Fix the release quickstart.yaml GH action
d66d6e6 
Update the .github/workflows/quickstart.yml github action and replace
the usage of `kubectl wait ...` with a function that waits until the
various OLM component deployment resources are present and reporting an
available status.

Using `kubectl wait ...` is potentially problematic as it doesn't
support waiting until the creation of that resource, so in the case the
PackageServer deployment doesn't exist yet as the catalog/olm operators
are still being setup, this action will fail as `kubectl wait ...` will
return a non-zero exit code.

Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: b98ff9d1601b41847fb47445a8366a1145c7cbe6
@benluddy @njhale
Expose errors generated while retrieving catalog content.
796800e 
Failing to fetch catalog content should not silently return an empty
cache. Instead, it should fail outright with an error that indicates
which catalog(s) could not be fetched.

Signed-off-by: Ben Luddy <bluddy@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 6ab5f1634093c91d7027b9245a88ede7b807088b
@timflannagan @njhale
v0.18.3 OLM release
f4f18e5 
Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 1e7e1cc81d5c3e0f2de2a06cb4315ea622371cbe
@dinhxuanvu @njhale
Update containerd dependency to fix vulnerabilities (openshift#719)
baefd55 
Update to containerd 1.4.8

Signed-off-by: Vu Dinh <vudinh@outlook.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-registry
Upstream-commit: aa44cbec0df254fb503a34384a85e197a7e68e6f
@timflannagan @njhale
doc/design: Update the changelog release documentation (#2298)
3236306 
Update the doc/design/release.md documentation around how to generate
the root CHANGELOG.md. Previously, when running into API rate limiting
behaviors locally, the suggestion was to modify a variable in the Ruby
gem package that no longer exists. Now, specify the --max-issues CLI
flag to lower the number of API requests to the OLM repository.

Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 5c40752a9605669d34234bf18a93dba948b59439
@timflannagan @njhale
.github/workflows: Avoid running the e2e-tests workflow on doc-only p…
e9d6213 
…ull requests (#2299)

Update the e2e-tests.yml github workflow and avoid running that action
on PRs that only change the doc directory.

Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 939bf94f834181d60a713191f78b13b80c7bec0f
@ecordell @njhale
don't return an error if the singleton rbac doesn't exist (#2309)
db6bcf0 
Signed-off-by: Evan <cordell.evan@gmail.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 538b1315eace85e33df7b2893a85a000f8757349
@ecordell @njhale
let net.Listen pick a port for grpc servers generated in tests (#2310)
c8f5739 
Signed-off-by: Evan <cordell.evan@gmail.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 44fc44daf778cd9d36d6b6eb8edf63ff5a202304
@timflannagan @njhale
internal/declcfg: Avoid processing the .indexignore file when walking…
eaf3fed 
… the root fs (openshift#733)

Update internal/declcfg/load.go and avoid processing any files that are
named `.indexignore` when walking the declarative config index root
filesystem. When validating declarative config directories, the
.indexignore file was being processed and validated.

Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-registry
Upstream-commit: 78f27b39dc098c2e56681d9a3d8e786aae95d4fe
@joelanford @njhale
setup multi-arch builds with goreleaser
d583245 
Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-registry
Upstream-commit: a390f86b3ca429c9618a7c20a31406bc2bd6ed16
@benluddy @njhale
Move operator caching from resolver into a new package. (#2316)
f64d86c 
Signed-off-by: Ben Luddy <bluddy@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 3a565917233c72d098f3a60d9239f0e3c5b55f76
@dmesser @njhale
add further console customization types
21ce2b6 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Messer <dmesser@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-registry
Upstream-commit: 70cec5728f5634fc696e13a0608dd7d01a170e12
@timflannagan @njhale
.github/workflows: Replace the e2e-kind job name with e2e in the test…
6ef8356 
… workflow (openshift#730)

Update the test.yml test workflow and replace the `e2e-kind` job name with
`e2e`. Before, the e2e test workflow had ran e2e tests against both kind
and minikube clusters before the latter job was removed entirely.

Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-registry
Upstream-commit: ff2c921e414926a013f82448b7241bc84fc95372
@exdx @njhale
feat: support removing the default channel head in deprecatetrunace (o…
1484151 
…penshift#734)

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sover <dsover@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-registry
Upstream-commit: b82684903f7af4e483efe5629d18c9a6db036dcb
@njhale
feat(release): X.Y, X, and latest opm image tags (openshift#738)
ec81e63 
build X.Y, X, and latest opm images
but only latest if X.Y.Z is latest semver in HEAD
and X.Y/X if the current HEAD commit is tagged.

Signed-off-by: Eric Stroczynski <ericstroczynski@gmail.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-registry
Upstream-commit: 6f1a54f7b7b4f5e4f062fde42cb477ae25d438f6
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 13, 2021
@njhale njhale changed the title WIP: downstream/upstream sync - first quarter WIP: 4.10 downstream/upstream sync - first quarter Oct 13, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: njhale

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 13, 2021
This was referenced Oct 13, 2021
Merged
Closed
Closed
@njhale
Copy link
Contributor Author

njhale commented Oct 14, 2021

/retest

3 similar comments
@njhale
Copy link
Contributor Author

njhale commented Oct 14, 2021

/retest

@njhale
Copy link
Contributor Author

njhale commented Oct 14, 2021

/retest

@njhale
Copy link
Contributor Author

njhale commented Oct 15, 2021

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2021 •
edited
Loading

@njhale: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-upgrade ec81e63 link true /test e2e-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@njhale
Copy link
Contributor Author

njhale commented Oct 16, 2021

/retest

@timflannagan
Copy link
Contributor

first 1/2 PR merged.

/close

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2021

@njhale: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 16, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2021

@timflannagan: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

first 1/2 PR merged.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Oct 16, 2021
anik120 pushed a commit to anik120/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2021
@perdasilva @anik120
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
cf281f2 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>

upstream-repository: api
upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
anik120 pushed a commit to anik120/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2021
@perdasilva @anik120
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
4a5c734 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
243d898 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
2c0573e 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
98c4a5c 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
b45c5fc 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
f7d6640 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
9c0062c 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
6cdae27 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
008a8c8 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
fdbc404 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
eb680c0 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
94a3277 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
1242fa9 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
48b1015 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
64021f4 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
a93b523 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
perdasilva added a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2022
@perdasilva
Add perdasilva to list of reviewers (openshift#201)
1a9c5fb 
Signed-off-by: Per G. da Silva <perdasilva@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: acd97ff97db07bae2b4e5a9cbc49355d4f6c568a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ankitathomas ankitathomas Awaiting requested review from ankitathomas

@dinhxuanvu dinhxuanvu Awaiting requested review from dinhxuanvu

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
8 participants
@njhale @timflannagan @benluddy @dinhxuanvu @ecordell @joelanford @dmesser @exdx