OCPBUGS-741: [release-4.7] Remove oudated subscription update logic to improve resolution delay #373
Conversation
Currently, olm logic checks for upgrade in subscription via another obsolete API that is no longer in use for dependency solution. As a result, sometimes, subscriptions display `UpgradeAvailable` status but there will be no upgrades as the upgrade is not valid in the resolver. Also, the `UpgradeAvailable` status is used to trigger the new resolution even though that status is no longer a valid indicator of having a pending upgrade. This leads to unwanted upgrade delay when the obsolete API works properly. This commit will remove the code that is using this obsolete API and allow the resolution to happen when there is a subscription change. Signed-off-by: Vu Dinh <vudinh@outlook.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 81e7a60bc7a62da4a469041ce89e3867e9f47fde
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered cloning bug for cherrypick for bug 2030489 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details. Full error message.
response code 401 not 200
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-4.6 |
|
@sferich888: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.6 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retitle [release-4.7] OCPBUGS-741: Remove oudated subscription update logic to improve resolution delay |
openshift-ci
bot
changed the title
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-bug
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-741, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
bugzilla/valid-bug
|
/label cherry-pick-approved |
|
@perdasilva: Can not set label cherry-pick-approved: Must be member in one of these teams: [] In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/approved |
|
/lgtm |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
backport-risk-assessed
|
/approve |
|
/label approved |
|
@perdasilva: Can not set label approved: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-release-oversight] In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retitle OCPBUGS-741: [release-4.7] Remove oudated subscription update logic to improve resolution delay |
openshift-ci
bot
changed the title
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/label cherry-pick-approved |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
cherry-pick-approved
|
@perdasilva This still needs the approved label. |
|
/approve |
|
I've created the cherry-pick PR on the upstream repo here: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/pull/2856/files I'll keep this PR up as a reminder until that one is merged |
|
/approve |
|
/hold |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: awgreene, openshift-cherrypick-robot, perdasilva The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
|
ok - this has finally merged. @sferich888 do we still need to back port this to 4.6? |
|
/close |
|
@perdasilva: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-741. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #222
/assign sferich888