fix(tabs): [tabs] modify tabs demo bug #2274
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes made in this pull request involve modifications to the default active tab in several Vue components, shifting the initial state of the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/basic-usage.vue (1)
Line range hint
1-34: Suggestion: Add tests and clarify the bug descriptionWhile the change improves the user experience, it would be beneficial to:
- Add tests to verify the default active tab behavior.
- Clarify in the PR description what specific bug this change is addressing.
Adding tests will ensure that this behavior is maintained in future updates and help prevent regressions.
Would you like assistance in generating test cases for this component?
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/tabs-separator-composition-api.vue (1)
Line range hint
35-36: Consider aligning initial active tab valuesThe
activeName1ref is initialized with'first', whileactiveName2is set to'second'. This might lead to inconsistent behavior between the two<tiny-tabs>components in the template. Consider aligning these values if the intention is to have both tab sets start with the same active tab.If you want to keep them different, it might be helpful to add a comment explaining why they have different initial values.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/tabs-separator.vue (1)
Line range hint
1-69: Suggestions for code improvement and reusabilityThe overall implementation looks good, but here are some suggestions to improve code organization and reusability:
Consider moving the hardcoded content in tab items to a data property. This would make it easier to manage and potentially allow for dynamic content updates.
The
handleaddmethod is currently specific to the third tab group. Consider making it more flexible to allow adding tabs to different tab groups.The first two tab groups have very similar structures. You could create a reusable component for these to reduce code duplication.
Here's an example of how you could refactor the data structure:
data() { return { activeNames: { group1: 'first', group2: 'second' }, tabGroups: [ { items: [ { title: '表单组件', name: 'first', content: '表单组件,具有与用户交互，并可完成数据采集功能的控件。' }, // ... other items ], separator: true, withClose: true }, // ... other groups ], dynamicTabs: [ { title: 'Tab 1', name: '1', content: 'Tab 1 content ' }, { title: 'Tab 2', name: '2', content: 'Tab 2 content' } ], tabIndex: 2 } }This structure would allow for more flexible and maintainable code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/basic-usage-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/basic-usage.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/basic-usage.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/tabs-separator-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/tabs-separator.vue (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/basic-usage-composition-api.vue (3)
16-16: LGTM: Default active tab changed to 'first'The change from
ref('second')toref('first')foractiveNameis correct and aligns with the intended bugfix. This modification will set the first tab as active by default when the component is rendered.
Line range hint
1-11: Verification: Template and script changes are consistentThe change in the script section (line 16) is consistent with the template structure:
- The
<tiny-tabs>component usesv-model="activeName", which now defaults to 'first'.- This corresponds to the first
<tiny-tab-item>withname="first".- The second tab (
name="second") is disabled, which may explain the need for this change.This modification ensures that an active, non-disabled tab is selected by default.
Also applies to: 16-16
16-16: Impact analysis: Bugfix addresses disabled default tab issueThis change appears to effectively address the reported bug in the tabs demo:
- It prevents a disabled tab (the second tab) from being selected by default.
- It ensures that an active, interactable tab is selected when the component is first rendered.
- The modification improves the initial user experience without introducing breaking changes.
The bugfix is straightforward and aligns well with expected component behavior.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/basic-usage.vue (1)
Line range hint
1-11: LGTM: Default tab change improves user experienceThe change from
activeName: 'second'toactiveName: 'first'is a good improvement. It sets the first tab ("表单组件") as the default active tab, which aligns better with user expectations. This is especially beneficial because the second tab is disabled, making it an unsuitable default choice.The modification enhances the initial user experience by presenting the first available and enabled tab content immediately upon component rendering.
Also applies to: 22-22
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/basic-usage.spec.ts (4)
27-27: LGTM! Consistent active bar width.The update to the expected active bar width (now 64px) after clicking the first tab is consistent with the earlier change. This ensures that the active bar maintains a consistent width across different tabs.
23-24: LGTM! Verify visual appearance of active tab indicator.The changes to the active bar's width (now 64px) and transform (now starting at 0px) suggest updates to the styling and positioning of the active tab indicator.
To ensure these changes result in the desired visual appearance, please:
- Run the component in a browser and visually inspect the active tab indicator.
- Consider adding a visual regression test to catch any unintended changes in the future.
You can use the following script to check for any related style changes in the component:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for style changes related to the active bar # Test: Search for style definitions related to the active bar rg --type vue '(width|transform).*64px' src/tabs
29-29: Verify intentional color change for active tab.The color of the first tab item has been updated from a blue tone (rgb(94, 124, 224)) to a dark gray/black (rgb(25, 25, 25)). This represents a significant change in the visual design of the active tab.
Please confirm that this color change is intentional and aligns with the project's design system. Run the following script to check for related color changes in the component:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for color changes in the tabs component # Test: Search for color definitions in the component files rg --type vue 'color.*rgb\(25, 25, 25\)' src/tabsAdditionally, consider updating the design documentation to reflect this change if it hasn't been done already.
22-22: Confirm intentional change in default tab content.The expected text content for the tab panel has been updated from "数据组件" (data components) to "表单组件" (form components). This change suggests a modification in the default active tab or its content.
Please verify that this change is intentional and consistent with the component's updated behavior. Run the following script to check the default tab content in the component:
✅ Verification successful
Default tab content updated to "表单组件" confirmed.
The presence of "表单组件" across multiple tab components in both mobile-first and PC demos indicates that this change is intentional and consistent with the component's behavior.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the default tab content in the component implementation # Test: Search for the default tab content in the component files rg --type vue '"表单组件"' src/tabsLength of output: 259
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of "表单组件" in component files without specifying file type # Test: Search for the text "表单组件" in all files within the src/tabs directory rg '"表单组件"' src/tabsLength of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the presence of "表单组件" across the entire codebase # Test: Recursively search for the text "表单组件" in all files rg '"表单组件"'Length of output: 3351
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/tabs-separator-composition-api.vue (1)
27-27: LGTM: Minor change to<tiny-tabs>component attributesThe
<tiny-tabs>component on line 27 has been updated with additional attributes::editable="false"and:with-add="true". These changes seem to disable tab editing while enabling the ability to add new tabs. The@add="handleadd"event handler has also been added to manage the addition of new tabs.
| await expect(tabItems).toHaveClass([ | ||
| /tiny-tabs__item is-top is-active/, | ||
| /tiny-tabs__item is-top is-disabled/, | ||
| /tiny-tabs__item is-top/, | ||
| /tiny-tabs__item is-top/ | ||
| ]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistency between test and component implementation.
The updated class names in examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/basic-usage.spec.ts were not found in the component's .vue files within src/tabs. Please ensure that the component uses the updated class names to maintain consistency with the tests.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify component implementation for consistency.
The updated class names for tab items provide more specific information about their states (active, disabled). This change improves the test's accuracy and likely reflects updates in the component's implementation.
To ensure consistency, please run the following script to verify the component's implementation:
Adjusting search method for .vue files. Please run the following script to verify the class names:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the tab item class names in the component implementation
# Test: Search for the class names in the component files
rg --type vue 'tiny-tabs__item is-(top|active|disabled)' src/tabs
Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate .vue files and verify the presence of specific tab item class names
# Find all .vue files within src/tabs and search for the specified class names
fd --extension vue src/tabs | xargs rg 'tiny-tabs__item is-(top|active|disabled)'
Length of output: 436
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/tab-style-bordercard.spec.ts (2)
14-14: LGTM: Active background color update.The change to
activeBgColoris consistent with the PR objectives. It slightly lightens the active tab background, which may improve visual contrast.Consider using a named constant or importing this color from a theme file for better maintainability:
import { ACTIVE_TAB_BG_COLOR } from '../theme-constants' // ... const activeBgColor = ACTIVE_TAB_BG_COLORThis approach would centralize color management and make future updates easier.
Line range hint
1-26: Consider enhancing test coverage.The current test case covers the basic functionality of the border card tab component. To improve robustness, consider adding the following test cases:
- Test tab switching for all tabs, not just the first and fifth.
- Verify that the inactive tabs have the correct background color.
- Test any keyboard navigation functionality if applicable.
- Check for proper ARIA attributes on the tabs for accessibility.
Here's a sample of how you might implement the first two suggestions:
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) { await tabItems.nth(i).click() await expect(tabItems.nth(i)).toHaveClass(/is-active/) await expect(tabItems.nth(i)).toHaveCSS('background-color', activeBgColor) await expect(content).toHaveText(new RegExp(String(i))) // Check that other tabs are inactive for (let j = 0; j < 5; j++) { if (j !== i) { await expect(tabItems.nth(j)).not.toHaveClass(/is-active/) await expect(tabItems.nth(j)).not.toHaveCSS('background-color', activeBgColor) } } }This will provide more comprehensive coverage of the tab component's behavior.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/tab-style-card.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-32: LGTM! Consider adding a visual regression test.The overall structure of the test case remains robust and comprehensive. It continues to verify important aspects such as:
- The presence of specific classes
- The correct number of tab items
- The text content of the tab panels
- The border styles of the tab items
The only change is the expected border color, which is consistently applied throughout the test.
Given that this change affects the visual appearance of the component, consider adding a visual regression test to catch any unintended visual changes in the future. This could be done using tools like Percy or Applitools with Playwright.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/size.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/tab-style-bordercard.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/tab-style-card.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/size.spec.ts (2)
11-11: LGTM, but please clarify the reason for the font size change.The change from 16px to 12px for the first header box's font size is consistent with the "小尺寸" (small size) test case. However, it would be helpful to understand the reasoning behind this reduction.
Could you please explain why the font size was decreased? Is this related to the bug fix mentioned in the PR description?
Line range hint
1-17: Overall concerns: Inconsistent sizing changes and lack of contextWhile the changes in this file are consistent with the AI-generated summary, they raise some concerns:
- The font size changes are inconsistent (one size decreased, another increased).
- These changes seem to contradict the "小尺寸" (small size) test case.
- There's not enough context provided in the PR description to understand the rationale behind these changes.
To ensure these changes are correct and align with the intended bug fix:
- Please provide more details about the bug that was fixed and how these changes address it.
- Confirm if the inconsistent sizing is intentional and explain the reasoning if so.
- Consider adding a comment in the test file explaining the new sizing logic, if it's indeed correct.
- Verify that these changes are consistent with the actual component implementation.
These clarifications will help ensure that the test accurately reflects the intended behavior of the tabs component.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/tab-style-bordercard.spec.ts (1)
17-17: Verify the significant change in tab header background color.The background color of the tab header has been changed from a dark gray (rgb(70, 76, 89)) to white (rgb(255, 255, 255)). This is a substantial visual change that aligns with the PR objectives.
Please confirm that this change:
- Is intentional and approved by the design team.
- Maintains sufficient contrast with the tab text for accessibility.
- Is consistent with other components in the Tiny Vue project.
Run the following script to check for any other occurrences of the old background color in the codebase:
If there are other occurrences, consider updating them for consistency or explain why they should remain unchanged.
✅ Verification successful
Background color change verified successfully.
No other instances of the old background color
rgb(70, 76, 89)were found in TypeScript or Vue files, ensuring consistency across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for other occurrences of the old background color # Test: Search for the old background color. Expect: No occurrences in other files. rg --type typescript --type vue "rgb\(70,\s*76,\s*89\)"Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for other occurrences of the old background color # Test: Search for the old background color. Expect: No occurrences in other files. rg --type ts --type vue "rgb\(70,\s*76,\s*89\)"Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for other occurrences of the old background color # Test: Search for the old background color in TypeScript and Vue files. Expect: No occurrences in other files. rg --type ts -g '*.vue' "rgb\(70,\s*76,\s*89\)"Length of output: 49
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/tabs/tab-style-card.spec.ts (1)
13-13: Clarify the reason for changing the border color and its relation to the bug fix.The border color has been updated from
rgb(223, 225, 230)torgb(240, 240, 240), which is a subtle change from light gray to an even lighter gray. While this change is consistently applied throughout the test case, it's not clear how this relates to the bug fix mentioned in the PR objectives.Could you please clarify:
- How does this border color change relate to the bug fix in the tabs demo?
- Is this change part of a broader visual update to the component?
Additionally, consider adding a comment explaining the reason for this specific color value, which would help future maintainers understand the purpose of this change.
✅ Verification successful
Border Color Change Verified as Part of a Broader Design Update
The border color has been updated from
rgb(223, 225, 230)torgb(240, 240, 240)across multiple test files, indicating a consistent visual update to the component's design. This change aligns with the PR objectives and ensures uniformity in the test cases. Adding a comment explaining this update would enhance code maintainability.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar color changes in other files # Test: Search for the old and new color values echo "Files containing the old color value:" rg --type vue --type typescript "rgb\(223, 225, 230\)" echo "Files containing the new color value:" rg --type vue --type typescript "rgb\(240, 240, 240\)"Length of output: 339
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar color changes in Vue and TypeScript files # Test: Search for the old and new color values in .vue and .ts files echo "Files containing the old color value:" rg -g '*.vue' -g '*.ts' 'rgb\(223, 225, 230\)' echo "Files containing the new color value:" rg -g '*.vue' -g '*.ts' 'rgb\(240, 240, 240\)'Length of output: 1707
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
show-more-tabsattribute from the<tiny-tabs>component for cleaner functionality.