-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 273
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(docs): Fixed an issue with the loading level of the document. #2411
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the introduction of new CSS custom properties for z-index control and enhancements to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
[e2e-test-warn] The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug". Please make sure you've read our contributing guide |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
examples/sites/src/style.css (1)
16-18
: Consider implementing a more structured z-index systemWhile the new z-index variables work functionally, the large gap between regular and highlight states (200/201 vs 2001/2002) might make z-index management harder to maintain. Consider:
- Using a more structured increment system (e.g., base + 10 for highlights)
- Documenting the z-index hierarchy
Here's a suggested approach:
--docs-header-zindex: 200; - --docs-header-zindex-highlight: 2002; + --docs-header-zindex-highlight: 210; --docs-layout-sider-zindex: 201; - --docs-layout-sider-zindex-highlight: 2001; + --docs-layout-sider-zindex-highlight: 211;Consider adding a comment block documenting the z-index hierarchy:
/* * Z-index hierarchy: * - markdown-top-body: 99 * - tabs-header: 100 * - header: 200 (highlight: 210) * - layout-sider: 201 (highlight: 211) * - float-settings: 999 */examples/sites/src/views/components/components.vue (1)
778-780
: LGTM: Z-index control implementation is clean and maintainable.The use of CSS custom properties for z-index control is a good practice. However, consider adding documentation for these CSS custom properties.
Consider adding comments to document the purpose and expected values of these CSS custom properties:
&.docs-header-highlight { + /* Controls the z-index of the header during loading state */ z-index: var(--docs-header-zindex-highlight); } &.docs-content-tabs-highlight :deep(.tiny-tabs__header) { + /* Controls the z-index of the tabs header during loading state */ z-index: var(--docs-layout-sider-zindex-highlight); }Also applies to: 830-832
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- examples/sites/src/style.css (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/src/views/components/components.vue (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
examples/sites/src/views/components/components.vue (2)
3-3
: LGTM: Header highlight class binding is well implemented.The conditional class binding for loading state follows Vue best practices and correctly implements the z-index control requirement.
98-104
: LGTM: Tabs highlight class binding is consistent with header implementation.The highlight class binding maintains consistency with the header implementation and properly handles the loading state visual feedback.
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes