-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 273
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: [grid] release319, update website to fix layout in small screen #2493
fix: [grid] release319, update website to fix layout in small screen #2493
Conversation
…in small screen sizes
…layed in small screen sizes
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several modifications across three components: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
[e2e-test-warn] The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug". Please make sure you've read our contributing guide |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
examples/sites/playground/App.vue
(4 hunks)examples/sites/src/views/components/components.vue
(1 hunks)examples/sites/src/views/layout/layout.vue
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
examples/sites/src/views/layout/layout.vue (2)
Line range hint 441-458
: LGTM: Existing mobile styles follow good responsive design patterns.
The mobile-specific styles for the sidebar are well implemented:
- Appropriate breakpoint (1023px) for mobile devices
- Clean handling of sidebar visibility
- Proper z-index management for overlay behavior
Line range hint 1-458
: Verify layout behavior across different screen sizes.
Given the changes to the min-width and the complex layout structure, please verify:
- Horizontal scrolling behavior on mobile devices
- Content overflow handling in the main area
- Interaction between the sidebar overlay and main content scrolling
- Layout stability during sidebar toggle operations
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the layout behavior:
Layout implementation is properly responsive and mobile-friendly
The codebase shows:
- The layout has proper mobile breakpoints with
@media
queries at 1023px for mobile devices - The sidebar has correct mobile handling:
@media (max-width: 1023px) { .layout-sider { display: none; position: fixed; height: 100%; } #layoutSider.showMenu { display: block !important; z-index: var(--docs-layout-sider-zindex); } }
- Content overflow is properly managed with:
- Flex layout with
ti-f-c ti-f-box-stretch
classes - Scrollable main content area with
overflow: hidden auto
- Fixed height calculations accounting for header:
height: calc(100vh - 60px)
- Flex layout with
The implementation follows mobile-first best practices and handles all the key responsive layout concerns appropriately.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related layout configurations that might be affected
echo "Searching for related layout configurations..."
rg -l "layout-content|--layout|content-layout" --type vue
# Look for potential scroll containers that might conflict
echo "Checking for scroll containers..."
ast-grep --pattern 'overflow: $scroll' --lang vue
ast-grep --pattern 'overflow-[xy]: $scroll' --lang vue
Length of output: 590
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related layout configurations with correct file type
echo "Searching for related layout configurations..."
rg -l "layout-content|--layout|content-layout"
# Look for potential scroll containers using css patterns
echo "Checking for scroll containers..."
rg "overflow.*:.*scroll|overflow-[xy].*:.*scroll"
# Check for responsive media queries
echo "Checking responsive styles..."
rg "@media.*\{" --type css --type less
# Check for mobile-specific layout handling
echo "Checking mobile-specific code..."
rg "mobile|responsive|screen" --type css --type less
Length of output: 212835
examples/sites/playground/App.vue (3)
15-15
: LGTM! Improved constant naming.
The rename from NOTIFY
to NOTIFY_KEY
better reflects its purpose as a storage key.
44-47
: LGTM! Consistent usage of renamed constant.
The localStorage operations correctly use the renamed NOTIFY_KEY
constant.
291-306
: LGTM! Improved mobile responsiveness.
Good use of the mobile-hide
class to selectively hide non-essential UI elements on small screens while keeping core functionality accessible. The changes maintain a clean interface by:
- Keeping the logo while hiding the title text
- Hiding layout controls that are less relevant on mobile
- Preserving the version selector while hiding its label
examples/sites/src/views/components/components.vue (1)
975-977
: LGTM!
The addition of overflow: auto;
to .docs-content-main
aligns with the PR objectives to fix layout issues on small screens and should improve scrolling behavior where content overflows.
--layout-content-main-min-width: 200px; | ||
--layout-content-main-max-width: 1000px; | ||
} | ||
@media screen and (max-width: 640px) { | ||
--layout-content-main-min-width: 600px; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix incorrect responsive design logic in media query.
There appears to be a logical error in the responsive design implementation. Currently:
- Base min-width is set to 200px
- For screens <= 640px, min-width increases to 600px
This is counterintuitive as smaller screens are being assigned a larger minimum width than larger screens, which could worsen the layout issues on mobile devices rather than fixing them.
Consider reversing the logic to:
.content-layout {
display: flex;
--layout-tree-menu-input-height: 32px;
- --layout-content-main-min-width: 200px;
+ --layout-content-main-min-width: 600px;
--layout-content-main-max-width: 1000px;
}
@media screen and (max-width: 640px) {
- --layout-content-main-min-width: 600px;
+ --layout-content-main-min-width: 200px;
}
This way:
- Larger screens maintain the original 600px min-width
- Smaller screens (<=640px) get a reduced 200px min-width, allowing for better mobile responsiveness
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
--layout-content-main-min-width: 200px; | |
--layout-content-main-max-width: 1000px; | |
} | |
@media screen and (max-width: 640px) { | |
--layout-content-main-min-width: 600px; | |
} | |
--layout-content-main-min-width: 600px; | |
--layout-content-main-max-width: 1000px; | |
} | |
@media screen and (max-width: 640px) { | |
--layout-content-main-min-width: 200px; | |
} |
/** 小屏幕时隐藏 */ | ||
@media screen and (max-width: 640px) { | ||
.mobile-hide { | ||
display: none; | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the breakpoint usage across the codebase.
Consider aligning mobile breakpoint with existing patterns
The codebase predominantly uses 767px
for mobile breakpoints, while your implementation uses 640px
. Consider updating to 767px
to maintain consistency with other mobile-specific media queries in:
- examples/react-site/src/views/components/componentsDetailTab.vue
- examples/react-site/src/views/components/componentsDetail.vue
- examples/sites/src/views/components/components.vue
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify mobile breakpoint across different devices.
The mobile-responsive CSS implementation looks good. However, please verify that the 640px breakpoint works well across various mobile devices and orientations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other breakpoint definitions to ensure consistency
rg -g '*.{vue,css,scss}' '@media.*\bmax-width\b'
Length of output: 1770
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
官网在小屏幕下的显示异常问题修复
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
.mobile-hide
to hide elements on smaller screens.VersionTip
andAsyncHighlight
for improved functionality.Bug Fixes
Style