feat: [config-provider] optimize global configuration component documentation #2578
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to various Vue components, primarily focusing on enhancing form functionality and design. Key changes include the addition of a new form structure with input fields for user data (name and age) and updated alert descriptions. Several components from the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
zzcr
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/basic.spec.ts (1)
13-20: Improve test clarity and reduce implementation couplingThe current test is tightly coupled to CSS implementation details. Consider:
- Testing the actual functionality rather than CSS implementation
- Using more explicit test descriptions
- Using English comments for better collaboration
- // 验证必填星号 + // Verify required field indicator behavior await expect(demo.locator('.tiny-form')).toBeVisible() - const beforeElement = await page.evaluate(() => { - const labelBefore = document.querySelector('.tiny-form .tiny-form-item__label') - const { display, content } = window.getComputedStyle(labelBefore, '::before') - return { display, content } - }) - expect(beforeElement.content).toBe('none') + // Test the actual required field behavior instead of CSS implementation + await expect(demo.locator('.tiny-form-item__label')).toHaveAttribute('required', 'false')examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base-composition-api.vue (3)
Line range hint
36-73: Maintain consistent documentation across component configurationsWhile the Alert component's renderless function is well documented, the Form and Button configurations lack similar documentation explaining their purpose and usage.
Consider adding JSDoc comments for Form and Button configurations:
const design = { name: 'x-design', version: '1.0.0', components: { + /** + * Form component global configuration + * @property {boolean} hideRequiredAsterisk - Hides the red asterisk for required fields + */ Form: { props: { hideRequiredAsterisk: true } }, + /** + * Button component global configuration + * @property {number} resetTime - Time in milliseconds for button reset + */ Button: { props: { resetTime: 0 } },
75-77: Consider adding type safety to form dataThe form data structure could benefit from better type safety and validation.
Consider adding type definitions:
+interface FormData { + name: string; + age: string | number; +} -const formData = ref({ +const formData = ref<FormData>({ name: '', age: '' })
82-84: Consider responsive design for form widthThe fixed width of 380px might not be optimal for all screen sizes.
Consider using responsive width:
.demo-form { - width: 380px; + width: 100%; + max-width: 380px; }examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base.vue (2)
7-12: Consider swapping the order of form fieldsTypically, in forms, it's common to ask for "姓名" (name) before "年龄" (age). Consider swapping the order of the form items to enhance the user experience.
Apply this diff to swap the form items:
<tiny-form :model="formData"> + <tiny-form-item label="姓名" prop="name" required> + <tiny-input v-model="formData.name"></tiny-input> + </tiny-form-item> <tiny-form-item label="年龄" prop="age" required> <tiny-numeric v-model="formData.age"></tiny-numeric> </tiny-form-item> - <tiny-form-item label="姓名" prop="name" required> - <tiny-input v-model="formData.name"></tiny-input> - </tiny-form-item>
86-87: Initializeageas a numeric valueCurrently,
ageis initialized as an empty string. Sinceageis expected to be a numeric value, consider initializing it to0to reflect its data type.Apply this diff:
formData: { name: '', - age: '' + age: 0 }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base-composition-api.vue(2 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base.vue(2 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/basic.spec.ts(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/form-composition-api.vue(0 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/form.spec.ts(0 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/form.vue(0 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/webdoc/config-provider.js(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/menus.js(1 hunks)packages/renderless/src/button/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/renderless/src/button/vue.ts(2 hunks)packages/renderless/src/form/index.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/form.spec.ts
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/form.vue
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/form-composition-api.vue
🔇 Additional comments (10)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/basic.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint 1-6: LGTM: Test setup follows best practices
The test setup properly handles page errors and navigation.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/webdoc/config-provider.js (2)
12-13: LGTM! Enhanced description provides better context
The updated Chinese description now better explains the design attribute's capabilities by including specific examples of its impact on form components and button behavior.
Line range hint 1-47: Verify the removal of form demo documentation
The AI summary indicates that a demo entry with demoId: 'form' was removed. While the base demo now mentions the form-related functionality, we should verify that this doesn't create a documentation gap for users.
Let's check if the form-related functionality is adequately documented elsewhere:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify if the form-related functionality is documented in the base demo or elsewhere.
Let me check the actual content of the base demo files to verify how the form-related functionality is documented.
No documentation gap created by the removal of form demo
The form-related functionality is adequately documented in the base demo. The base demo includes:
- A practical example showing form configuration through ConfigProvider
- Clear demonstration of the
hideRequiredAsteriskproperty in the Form component configuration - Both Options API (base.vue) and Composition API (base-composition-api.vue) implementations
- The description in the demo already explains "全局配置 Form 表单组件的必填星号是否默认显示" (Global configuration of whether the form component's required asterisk is displayed by default)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for form-related documentation in other files
# Check for form-related examples or documentation
echo "Searching for form-related examples in demo files..."
rg -l "config-provider.*form" "examples/sites/demos/pc/"
# Check if the removed demo file still exists
echo "Checking if the removed demo file exists..."
fd "form.vue" "examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/"
Length of output: 385
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the base demo content for form-related documentation
echo "Checking base demo content..."
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/webdoc/base.vue
# Search for form-related configuration in the component's documentation
echo "Searching for form-related configuration in docs..."
rg -i "form.*required|required.*form|form.*star" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/
Length of output: 913
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of base demo files
echo "Content of base.vue:"
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base.vue
echo -e "\nContent of base-composition-api.vue:"
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base-composition-api.vue
Length of output: 4378
packages/renderless/src/button/index.ts (2)
16-16: LGTM: Clean function signature update
The addition of designConfig parameter is well-typed and follows TypeScript best practices.
31-36: Address potential timer-related issues
The timer implementation could benefit from some improvements:
-
Verify timer cleanup on unmount:
-
Consider these improvements:
// In types file:
+ interface IButtonState {
+ disabled: boolean;
+ timer: number | null;
+ }
// In the component:
- state.timer = window.setTimeout(() => {
+ state.timer = setTimeout(() => {
state.disabled = false
}, resetTime)- Consider using a ref to track the disabled state instead of a plain state object for better reactivity in Vue.
packages/renderless/src/button/vue.ts (2)
21-21: Verify designConfig implementation in IButtonRenderlessParamUtils
The addition of designConfig parameter looks correct, but we should verify its implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the extensive search results, I can now generate the final response:
designConfig parameter is correctly implemented and used throughout the codebase
The designConfig parameter is a valid and widely used configuration object across the codebase that:
- Is properly typed in shared type definitions as a component design configuration
- Is consistently passed through the renderless architecture
- Is used to configure various aspects like:
- UI component styling and behavior
- Icon configurations
- Default values and constants
- Component-specific settings
The addition of this parameter to the button component's renderless function is consistent with the codebase's architecture and follows the established pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the interface definition and usage of designConfig
# Check the interface definition
rg -A 5 "interface IButtonRenderlessParamUtils"
# Check other usages of designConfig in button-related files
rg "designConfig.*IButtonRenderlessParamUtils"
Length of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the interface definition and its usage more thoroughly
# Find the interface definition in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'interface IButtonRenderlessParamUtils {
$$$
}'
# Check all usages of designConfig in button-related files
rg "designConfig" -A 3 -B 3
# Look for type definitions that might include designConfig
rg "type.*designConfig|interface.*designConfig" -A 3
Length of output: 102984
46-46: Verify handleClick implementation accepts designConfig
The handleClick function is being called with designConfig, but we need to ensure the implementation handles this parameter correctly.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for the actual implementation of handleClick function.
Let me search specifically in the button component directory for the handleClick implementation.
Let me see the complete implementation of handleClick in the index.ts file.
handleClick implementation correctly handles designConfig parameter
The implementation properly uses the designConfig parameter to determine the reset time with proper fallback logic:
resetTime = designConfig?.props?.resetTime ?? props.resetTime🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify handleClick implementation
# Check the handleClick function definition and usage
ast-grep --pattern 'handleClick = ({ $$$, designConfig }) => {
$$$
}'
# Look for other usages of handleClick with designConfig
rg -A 5 "handleClick.*designConfig"
Length of output: 459
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for handleClick function implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const handleClick = ({ $$ }) => {
$$$
}'
# Also search with function declaration syntax
ast-grep --pattern 'function handleClick({ $$ }) {
$$$
}'
# Backup search with ripgrep
rg -A 10 "^(const |function )?handleClick"
Length of output: 17717
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for handleClick implementation in button directory
rg -A 10 "handleClick" packages/renderless/src/button/
# Also try to find any file that might contain the implementation
fd . packages/renderless/src/button/
Length of output: 2301
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation of handleClick from index.ts
cat packages/renderless/src/button/index.ts
Length of output: 1460
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base-composition-api.vue (1)
24-33: Verify TinyModal usage
TinyModal is imported but appears to be used only in the Alert's renderless function. Consider if this modal functionality is actually needed.
examples/sites/demos/pc/menus.js (1)
83-83: LGTM! Appropriate categorization of ConfigProvider component.
Moving the ConfigProvider to the Basic category makes logical sense as it's a foundational component that affects the entire application's configuration.
✅ Verification successful
ConfigProvider component placement verified - no duplicates found
The verification confirms that ConfigProvider appears exactly once in the menu structure, indicating successful relocation without any duplicate entries.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that ConfigProvider only appears once in the menu structure
echo "Checking for duplicate ConfigProvider entries..."
rg -c "'name': 'ConfigProvider'" examples/sites/demos/pc/menus.js
Length of output: 188
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base.vue (1)
4-17: Good implementation of form components
The template additions are well-structured and correctly implemented. The use of tiny-form, tiny-form-item, tiny-input, and tiny-numeric components is appropriate.
| // 验证按钮点击禁用时间 | ||
| await demo.locator('.tiny-button').click() | ||
| await expect(demo.locator('.tiny-button')).not.toBeDisabled({ timeout: 300 }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve button state test reliability and clarity
The current test uses a fixed timeout and lacks clear documentation of the expected behavior.
- // 验证按钮点击禁用时间
+ // Verify button state after click
await demo.locator('.tiny-button').click()
- await expect(demo.locator('.tiny-button')).not.toBeDisabled({ timeout: 300 })
+ // Wait for button to become enabled and verify its state
+ await expect(demo.locator('.tiny-button')).toBeEnabled()Additionally, consider adding a comment explaining the expected behavior and why we're testing this specific interaction.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // 验证按钮点击禁用时间 | |
| await demo.locator('.tiny-button').click() | |
| await expect(demo.locator('.tiny-button')).not.toBeDisabled({ timeout: 300 }) | |
| // Verify button state after click | |
| await demo.locator('.tiny-button').click() | |
| // Wait for button to become enabled and verify its state | |
| await expect(demo.locator('.tiny-button')).toBeEnabled() |
| // 验证自定义方法 | ||
| const demo = page.locator('#base') | ||
| await demo.locator('.tiny-config-provider .tiny-alert > .tiny-alert__close').click() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(500) | ||
| await expect(page.locator('.tiny-modal > .tiny-modal__box').nth(1)).toHaveText('触发自定方法') | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve test reliability and maintainability
Consider the following improvements:
- Replace
waitForTimeoutwithwaitForSelectororwaitForEventfor more reliable testing - Consider using data-testid attributes instead of class selectors
- Consider using English comments for better international collaboration
- // 验证自定义方法
+ // Verify custom method
const demo = page.locator('#base')
await demo.locator('.tiny-config-provider .tiny-alert > .tiny-alert__close').click()
- await page.waitForTimeout(500)
+ await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-modal > .tiny-modal__box')
await expect(page.locator('.tiny-modal > .tiny-modal__box').nth(1)).toHaveText('触发自定方法')Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const DEFAULT_RESETTIME = 1000 | ||
|
|
||
| let resetTime = DEFAULT_RESETTIME | ||
|
|
||
| if (props.resetTime !== DEFAULT_RESETTIME) { | ||
| resetTime = props.resetTime | ||
| } else { | ||
| resetTime = designConfig?.props?.resetTime ?? props.resetTime | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify reset time logic
The current implementation can be simplified for better maintainability and readability.
Consider these improvements:
- Move the constant to the top level:
+ const DEFAULT_RESETTIME = 1000;
export const handleClick =
({ emit, props, state, designConfig }: Pick<IButtonRenderlessParams, 'emit' | 'props' | 'state' | 'designConfig'>) =>
(event: MouseEvent): void => {
- const DEFAULT_RESETTIME = 1000- Simplify the reset time logic:
- let resetTime = DEFAULT_RESETTIME
-
- if (props.resetTime !== DEFAULT_RESETTIME) {
- resetTime = props.resetTime
- } else {
- resetTime = designConfig?.props?.resetTime ?? props.resetTime
- }
+ const resetTime = props.resetTime === DEFAULT_RESETTIME
+ ? (designConfig?.props?.resetTime ?? DEFAULT_RESETTIME)
+ : props.resetTime;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| <tiny-form :model="formData"> | ||
| <tiny-form-item label="年龄" prop="age" required> | ||
| <tiny-numeric v-model="formData.age"></tiny-numeric> | ||
| </tiny-form-item> | ||
| <tiny-form-item label="姓名" prop="name" required> | ||
| <tiny-input v-model="formData.name"></tiny-input> | ||
| </tiny-form-item> | ||
| <tiny-form-item> | ||
| <tiny-button type="primary"> 提交 </tiny-button> | ||
| </tiny-form-item> | ||
| </tiny-form> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add form submission handler and validation rules
The form structure is well-organized, but it's missing essential functionality:
- The submit button lacks a click handler
- No form validation rules are defined for the required fields
- The age numeric input should have min/max constraints
Consider applying these improvements:
-<tiny-form :model="formData">
+<tiny-form
+ :model="formData"
+ :rules="rules"
+ @submit="handleSubmit">
<tiny-form-item label="年龄" prop="age" required>
- <tiny-numeric v-model="formData.age"></tiny-numeric>
+ <tiny-numeric
+ v-model="formData.age"
+ :min="0"
+ :max="150">
+ </tiny-numeric>
</tiny-form-item>
<!-- ... -->
<tiny-form-item>
- <tiny-button type="primary"> 提交 </tiny-button>
+ <tiny-button type="primary" @click="handleSubmit"> 提交 </tiny-button>
</tiny-form-item>
</tiny-form>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ export const computedAutoLabelWidth = | |||
| export const computedHideRequiredAsterisk = | |||
| ({ props, designConfig }: Pick<IFormRenderlessParams, 'props' | 'designConfig'>) => | |||
| (): boolean => { | |||
| return props.hideRequiredAsterisk ?? designConfig?.hideRequiredAsterisk ?? false | |||
| return props.hideRequiredAsterisk ?? designConfig?.props?.hideRequiredAsterisk ?? false | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent usage of designConfig.props pattern detected
The search results reveal inconsistent usage of the designConfig structure across the codebase:
-
Direct access pattern (
designConfig?.property):showInputSearchin transfer-panelshowTimePickerRangeButtonin time-rangeshowTimePickerButtonin timeitemMarginSpacein time-spinnertriggerBarConWithLinein splithideRequiredAsteriskin mobile/form
-
Props namespace pattern (
designConfig?.props?.property):stopPropagationin selecthideRequiredAsteriskin formresetTimein button
This inconsistency needs to be addressed to maintain a uniform configuration structure.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify consistent usage of designConfig.props pattern
The change correctly adapts to the new designConfig structure by accessing hideRequiredAsterisk through the props namespace.
Let's verify that this pattern is consistently applied across other similar computed properties in the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of designConfig.props pattern
# Look for other computed properties that might need similar updates
# Search for direct designConfig property access
rg "designConfig\?\.\w+\s*\?\?" --type ts
# Search for the new pattern with props namespace
rg "designConfig\?.props\?\.\w+\s*\?\?" --type ts
# Search for all computedHideRequiredAsterisk references to ensure consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'computedHideRequiredAsterisk = $_'
Length of output: 1284
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
packages/renderless/src/button/vue.ts (1)
Line range hint
30-33: Consider using optional chaining for buttonGroup accessThe access to
parent.buttonGroupcould benefit from optional chaining to make it consistent with the defensive programming style used elsewhere.- plain: computed(() => props.plain || (parent.buttonGroup || {}).plain), + plain: computed(() => props.plain || parent.buttonGroup?.plain ?? false), - buttonDisabled: computed(() => props.disabled || state.disabled || (parent.buttonGroup || {}).disabled || state.formDisabled) + buttonDisabled: computed(() => props.disabled || state.disabled || parent.buttonGroup?.disabled || state.formDisabled)🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 28-28: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 30-30: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 32-32: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
packages/vue/src/button/src/mobile-first.vue (1)
Line range hint
1-65: Documentation improvements needed for the button componentGiven this PR's focus on documentation enhancement, consider adding the following documentation improvements:
- Add JSDoc comments for the component describing its purpose and usage
- Document the relationship between props and internal state
- Include examples of round vs non-round button usage
Add component documentation at the top of the file:
+/** + * @component Button + * @description A versatile button component that supports various states and appearances + * + * @example + * <tiny-button type="primary" :round="true"> + * Round Button + * </tiny-button> + * + * @property {Boolean} round - Controls the rounded corners of the button + * @property {Boolean} circle - Makes the button circular + * @property {String} type - Button type: 'default' | 'primary' | 'text' + * @property {Boolean} loading - Shows loading state + * @property {Boolean} disabled - Disables the button + */ <template>examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base-composition-api.vue (3)
24-33: Optimize imports for better code splittingThe
TinyModalimport is only used within the Alert's renderless function. Consider moving it inside the function for better code splitting.import { TinyConfigProvider, TinyAlert, - TinyModal, TinyForm, TinyFormItem, TinyInput, TinyNumeric, TinyButton } from '@opentiny/vue'Then update the renderless function:
renderless: (props, hooks, { emit }, api) => { const { TinyModal } = require('@opentiny/vue') const state = api.state // ... }
46-51: Remove unused button configurationThe
resetTime: 0property seems unnecessary as there's no reset functionality implemented.Button: { props: { - resetTime: 0, round: true } }
88-90: Consider responsive design for form widthThe fixed width of 380px might not be optimal for all screen sizes. Consider using responsive units or media queries.
.demo-form { - width: 380px; + width: 100%; + max-width: 380px; + margin: 0 auto; }packages/vue/src/button/src/pc.vue (1)
Line range hint
23-32: Consider enhancing type safety and documentationThe class binding logic combines multiple appearance-related properties. Consider these improvements:
- Add TypeScript type definitions for the state object
- Document the state management pattern for future maintainers
- Consider grouping related appearance props (round, circle, ghost) into a single appearance prop
Example type definition:
interface ButtonState { buttonDisabled: boolean plain: boolean round: boolean // ... other state properties }packages/vue/src/button/src/index.ts (1)
58-61: LGTM! Improved property structureThe new structure for the
roundproperty aligns with the component's property definition pattern, making it more consistent with other properties liketypeandsize. This change enhances type safety and improves API documentation clarity.Consider adding a JSDoc comment for the
roundproperty similar to other properties, to maintain documentation consistency:/** 是否圆角按钮 */ round: { type: Boolean, default: undefined },examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base.vue (1)
4-17: Consider expanding the demo to better showcase ConfigProvider capabilities.While the current demo shows form configuration, consider adding more examples that demonstrate:
- Theme configuration
- Multiple component configurations in one provider
- Nested providers with different configurations
- Common use cases and best practices
This would better align with the PR's objective of optimizing the global configuration component documentation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base-composition-api.vue(2 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base.vue(2 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/webdoc/config-provider.js(1 hunks)packages/renderless/src/button/vue.ts(2 hunks)packages/renderless/types/button.type.ts(1 hunks)packages/vue/src/button/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/vue/src/button/src/mobile-first.vue(1 hunks)packages/vue/src/button/src/pc.vue(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/webdoc/config-provider.js
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/renderless/src/button/vue.ts
[error] 28-28: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
packages/renderless/types/button.type.ts (1)
10-10: LGTM! Type definition follows best practices.
The new round property is correctly typed as ComputedRef<boolean>, consistent with other similar properties in the interface.
Let's verify the implementation and documentation:
✅ Verification successful
The round property is properly implemented and used in the codebase
The verification shows that:
- The
roundproperty is correctly implemented in the renderless button logic (packages/renderless/src/button/vue.ts) using computed property - It's properly defined as a prop in the mobile button component (
packages/mobile/components/button/src/button.ts) - The property is being used in button-related Vue templates (as seen in demo files)
- The implementation follows the type definition, using
ComputedRef<boolean>with a default value from design config or false
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for implementation and documentation of the round property
# Check for implementation in button component
echo "Checking button component implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'round: computed(() => $$$)'
# Check for documentation
echo "Checking documentation..."
fd -e md -e vue . | xargs rg -l 'round.*button' -A 5
Length of output: 1028
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation and documentation more thoroughly
# Check for round property implementation in button components
echo "Checking button implementation..."
rg -l "round.*=.*computed" --type ts
# Check the actual implementation
echo "Checking actual round property implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const round = computed(() => $$$)'
# Check for round property in button interfaces/types
echo "Checking type definitions..."
rg -A 3 "interface.*Button" --type ts
# Check documentation in button-related files
echo "Checking documentation in button files..."
fd "button" -e md | xargs cat
# Check Vue template usage
echo "Checking template usage..."
rg -l "round.*button" --type vue
Length of output: 8954
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the button component implementation and usage
# Check for round property in button component implementation
echo "Checking button component implementation..."
rg -t ts -A 5 "round.*=.*computed"
# Check Vue template usage with explicit extension
echo "Checking template usage..."
fd -e vue "button" | xargs rg -l "round"
# Check for button props definition
echo "Checking button props..."
rg -t ts "props.*round" -A 3
# Check for round property in renderless implementation
echo "Checking renderless implementation..."
fd "button" -e ts | xargs rg "round.*:" -A 2
Length of output: 3457
packages/renderless/src/button/vue.ts (3)
29-29: LGTM! Well-structured fallback chain
The implementation of the round computed property follows good practices with proper fallback values using the nullish coalescing operator.
47-47: Verify handleClick implementation for designConfig usage
The designConfig parameter has been added to handleClick. Let's verify its implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: designConfig is properly implemented in handleClick
The implementation correctly uses designConfig to provide a fallback value for resetTime when the prop's value matches the default. The usage follows the optional chaining pattern designConfig?.props?.resetTime with a fallback to props.resetTime.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check handleClick implementation in index.ts
rg -A 10 "export const handleClick = \({" packages/renderless/src/button/
Length of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for handleClick implementation with proper escaping
rg -A 10 "export const handleClick = \(\{" packages/renderless/src/button/
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler search pattern for handleClick
rg -A 10 "handleClick" packages/renderless/src/button/
Length of output: 2184
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's get the complete implementation of handleClick function
rg -A 20 "export const handleClick =" packages/renderless/src/button/index.ts
Length of output: 771
21-21: Verify IButtonRenderlessParamUtils interface documentation
The addition of designConfig to the parameters looks good, but ensure that the IButtonRenderlessParamUtils interface documentation is updated to reflect this change.
packages/vue/src/button/src/mobile-first.vue (1)
18-18: Verify state initialization for the round property
The change from direct prop usage to state-based rendering requires proper state initialization and prop synchronization.
Let's verify the state management implementation:
✅ Verification successful
State initialization for round property is properly implemented
After reviewing the renderless implementation, the change from direct prop usage to state-based rendering is correct and safe. The round property is properly managed through a computed state property that:
- Falls back to design config if prop is not provided
- Reactively updates when the prop changes
- Has proper type safety through TypeScript interfaces
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the state initialization logic in the renderless implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const state = $$$' packages/vue/src/button/src/renderless.ts
# Look for watch or computed property handling round prop
rg -A 5 "watch.*round|computed.*round" packages/vue/src/button/src/renderless.ts
Length of output: 336
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct path for the renderless implementation
fd renderless.ts -t f
# Let's also check the mobile-first.vue file to understand the state management
rg -A 10 "state\s*=|setup.*\(" packages/vue/src/button/src/mobile-first.vue
# Look for any round-related prop definitions
rg -A 3 "round.*:" packages/vue/src/button/src/mobile-first.vue
Length of output: 489
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the entire mobile-first.vue file content to understand the component structure
cat packages/vue/src/button/src/mobile-first.vue
# Let's also search for any imported renderless files
rg -l "import.*renderless" packages/vue/src/button/src/mobile-first.vue
Length of output: 2028
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the renderless implementation from @opentiny/vue-renderless
fd -t f button.*vue.ts$ -x cat {}
# Also check if there are any other button-related files that might contain the state initialization
fd -t f "button.*\.(ts|js)$"
Length of output: 2487
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the button implementation in the renderless package
cat packages/renderless/src/button/vue.ts 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found"
# Let's also check if there's a button.ts in the renderless package
cat packages/renderless/src/button/index.ts 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found"
# Let's check the common setup implementation since it's imported
rg -l "export.*setup" packages/vue/src/common/
Length of output: 3323
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base-composition-api.vue (2)
6-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance form validation and improve button labeling
The form structure needs improvements:
- Missing validation rules for required fields
- Button label "校验" (validate) should be "提交" (submit) to match its purpose
-<tiny-form ref="ruleFormRef" :model="formData">
+<tiny-form
+ ref="ruleFormRef"
+ :model="formData"
+ :rules="formRules">
<!-- ... -->
- <tiny-button @click="handleSubmitPromise" type="primary"> 校验 </tiny-button>
+ <tiny-button @click="handleSubmitPromise" type="primary"> 提交 </tiny-button>Add the validation rules in the script section:
const formRules = {
name: [{ required: true, message: '请输入姓名', trigger: 'blur' }],
age: [
{ required: true, message: '请输入年龄', trigger: 'blur' },
{ type: 'number', min: 0, max: 150, message: '年龄必须在0到150之间', trigger: 'blur' }
]
}41-45:
Review form configuration for required field indicators
Setting hideRequiredAsterisk: true contradicts the presence of required fields in the form. This might confuse users about which fields are mandatory.
Form: {
props: {
- hideRequiredAsterisk: true
+ hideRequiredAsterisk: false
}
}packages/vue/src/button/src/pc.vue (1)
27-27: Verify state initialization of the round property
The change from direct prop usage to state-managed value looks good, but we should verify the state initialization in the renderless logic.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results and generate additional verification scripts to check the state initialization.
The previous search didn't show the complete state initialization. Let's look for the state management implementation in the button component to verify how the round property is handled.
Let me try a different search pattern to find the state initialization.
Let's look for the state management implementation with these broader patterns to verify how the round property is handled.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response. The code shows that the round property is properly managed through a computed state in the renderless implementation (packages/renderless/src/button/vue.ts):
round: computed(() => props.round ?? designConfig?.props?.round ?? false)This means the state.round is properly initialized and reactively bound to the prop value, with a fallback to the design config or false. The change from direct prop usage to state-managed value is correct and follows Vue's composition API patterns.
State initialization for round property is properly implemented
The round property is correctly managed through computed state with proper prop binding and fallback values. The change is safe and follows Vue's best practices.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the state initialization in renderless implementation
# Expected: Find the state initialization for the round property
# Search for the renderless implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export const renderless = function ($_, $_) {
$$$
round: $_
$$$
}'
# Backup: If not found in the exact pattern, search for any round-related initialization
rg -A 5 "round.*=" --type ts
Length of output: 27159
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for button's renderless implementation and state initialization
ast-grep --pattern 'export const renderless = function ($_, $_) {
$$$
state: {
$$$
round: $_
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Search for state initialization in the button component
rg -A 10 "state\s*=\s*reactive" packages/vue/src/button/src/pc.vue
Length of output: 196
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the button's renderless implementation in vue.ts
rg -A 20 "round.*computed" packages/renderless/src/button/
# Search for the setup function in the button component
rg -A 20 "setup.*\(" packages/vue/src/button/src/pc.vue
# Search for state initialization in the button component with a broader pattern
rg -B 5 -A 10 "state.*=.*{" packages/vue/src/button/src/pc.vue
Length of output: 1747
packages/vue/src/button/src/index.ts (1)
58-61: Verify the default value change impact
The change from an implicit false to explicit undefined default value might affect existing code that relies on the falsy behavior of the round property. Please ensure this change is intentional and documented in the changelog.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the usage patterns and documentation to better understand the impact of this change.
Let me analyze the button component's usage patterns and test coverage to better understand the impact of this change.
Change to round property is safe and aligns with documentation standards
The change from a simple Boolean to an object with type: Boolean, default: undefined is safe because:
- Vue's boolean prop behavior treats both
undefinedand missing prop the same way, defaulting tofalse - The change matches the component's prop definition pattern, improving documentation consistency
- Found example usage in demos (examples/sites/demos/mobile-first/app/button/round.vue) showing this is a documented feature
- The mobile version of the button component (packages/mobile/components/button/src/button.ts) uses a simple Boolean, indicating this change is specific to the Vue package's documentation efforts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of the round property to assess impact
rg -A 2 "(?i):round|v-bind:round|round=" --type vue
Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of the round property in all files
rg -A 2 "(?i):round|v-bind:round|round=" --type-add 'vue:*.{vue,md}' --type vue
# Search for test files related to button round property
rg -l "round.*button" --type ts
# Look for button component documentation
fd -e md . packages/vue/src/button
# Check if there are any demo files showing round button usage
fd "demo" . packages/vue/src/button
Length of output: 27263
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the button component's tests and documentation
rg -l "round.*button" packages/vue/src/button/
# Check for button demos and usage examples
fd -e vue . examples/sites/demos/ | xargs rg -l "round.*button"
# Look for button component's test files
fd "button" . -e spec.ts -e test.ts | xargs rg -l "round"
# Check the component's default prop values in source
ast-grep --pattern 'export const buttonProps = {
$$$
round: $_,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 8476
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base.vue (2)
23-43: LGTM! Component imports and registration are well-structured.
The imports and component registration follow best practices and are properly organized.
101-103: LGTM! Styling is clean and properly scoped.
The form width constraint is appropriate for the demo layout.
| const handleSubmitPromise = () => { | ||
| ruleFormRef.value.validate() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const formData = ref({ | ||
| name: '', | ||
| age: '' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve form validation handling and data initialization
The current implementation has two issues:
- The validation result is not handled
- Age field is initialized with an empty string instead of null/undefined
-const handleSubmitPromise = () => {
- ruleFormRef.value.validate()
+const handleSubmitPromise = async () => {
+ try {
+ await ruleFormRef.value.validate()
+ // Handle successful validation
+ console.log('Form validated successfully:', formData.value)
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Validation failed:', error)
+ }
}
const formData = ref({
name: '',
- age: ''
+ age: null
})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const handleSubmitPromise = () => { | |
| ruleFormRef.value.validate() | |
| } | |
| const formData = ref({ | |
| name: '', | |
| age: '' | |
| const handleSubmitPromise = async () => { | |
| try { | |
| await ruleFormRef.value.validate() | |
| // Handle successful validation | |
| console.log('Form validated successfully:', formData.value) | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Validation failed:', error) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| const formData = ref({ | |
| name: '', | |
| age: null | |
| }) |
| @@ -1,26 +1,64 @@ | |||
| <template> | |||
| <div> | |||
| <tiny-config-provider :design="design"> | |||
| <tiny-alert type="warning" description="type 为 warning"></tiny-alert> | |||
| <div class="demo-form"> | |||
| <tiny-alert type="warning" description="全局配置组件的默认行为"></tiny-alert> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the alert description to better document the config-provider capabilities.
The current description "全局配置组件的默认行为" (default behavior of global configuration component) is too generic. Consider expanding it to highlight key features and use cases.
-<tiny-alert type="warning" description="全局配置组件的默认行为"></tiny-alert>
+<tiny-alert type="warning" description="通过 ConfigProvider 组件，你可以全局配置组件的默认属性、样式主题和行为。本示例展示了表单组件的自定义配置。"></tiny-alert>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <tiny-alert type="warning" description="全局配置组件的默认行为"></tiny-alert> | |
| <tiny-alert type="warning" description="通过 ConfigProvider 组件，你可以全局配置组件的默认属性、样式主题和行为。本示例展示了表单组件的自定义配置。"></tiny-alert> |
| handleSubmitPromise() { | ||
| this.$refs.ruleFormRef.validate() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve form validation handling and user feedback.
The current validation implementation doesn't handle the validation result or provide user feedback.
handleSubmitPromise() {
- this.$refs.ruleFormRef.validate()
+ this.$refs.ruleFormRef.validate((valid) => {
+ if (valid) {
+ TinyModal.message({ type: 'success', message: '验证通过' })
+ } else {
+ TinyModal.message({ type: 'error', message: '请检查表单填写是否正确' })
+ }
+ })
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| handleSubmitPromise() { | |
| this.$refs.ruleFormRef.validate() | |
| } | |
| handleSubmitPromise() { | |
| this.$refs.ruleFormRef.validate((valid) => { | |
| if (valid) { | |
| TinyModal.message({ type: 'success', message: '验证通过' }) | |
| } else { | |
| TinyModal.message({ type: 'error', message: '请检查表单填写是否正确' }) | |
| } | |
| }) | |
| } |
| name: 'x-design', // 设计规范名称 | ||
| version: '1.0.0', // 设计规范版本号 | ||
| components: { | ||
| Form: { | ||
| props: { | ||
| hideRequiredAsterisk: true | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| Button: { | ||
| props: { | ||
| resetTime: 0, | ||
| round: true | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add documentation for configuration options.
The design configuration lacks proper documentation explaining the purpose and impact of each setting. Consider adding detailed comments for better understanding.
design: {
- name: 'x-design', // 设计规范名称
+ name: 'x-design', // 设计规范名称，用于指定全局样式主题
version: '1.0.0', // 设计规范版本号
components: {
Form: {
+ // Form 组件的全局配置
props: {
+ // 隐藏表单项必填字段的星号标记
hideRequiredAsterisk: true
}
},
Button: {
+ // Button 组件的全局配置
props: {
+ // 设置按钮点击后的重置时间（毫秒）
resetTime: 0,
+ // 设置按钮为圆角样式
round: true
}
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| name: 'x-design', // 设计规范名称 | |
| version: '1.0.0', // 设计规范版本号 | |
| components: { | |
| Form: { | |
| props: { | |
| hideRequiredAsterisk: true | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| Button: { | |
| props: { | |
| resetTime: 0, | |
| round: true | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| name: 'x-design', // 设计规范名称，用于指定全局样式主题 | |
| version: '1.0.0', // 设计规范版本号 | |
| components: { | |
| Form: { | |
| // Form 组件的全局配置 | |
| props: { | |
| // 隐藏表单项必填字段的星号标记 | |
| hideRequiredAsterisk: true | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| Button: { | |
| // Button 组件的全局配置 | |
| props: { | |
| // 设置按钮点击后的重置时间（毫秒） | |
| resetTime: 0, | |
| // 设置按钮为圆角样式 | |
| round: true | |
| } | |
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base-composition-api.vue (3)
5-5: Enhance alert description for better documentationSince this is a documentation example, the alert description should be more informative about what the demo actually demonstrates.
- <tiny-alert type="warning" description="全局配置组件的默认行为"></tiny-alert> + <tiny-alert type="warning" description="此示例展示如何使用ConfigProvider来自定义组件的默认行为，包括表单验证、按钮样式等配置"></tiny-alert>
24-33: Consider reorganizing imports for better maintainabilityThe
TinyModalimport could be moved to the Alert configuration section since it's only used there. This would make the code more maintainable by keeping related imports closer to their usage.import { TinyConfigProvider, TinyAlert, - TinyModal, TinyForm, TinyFormItem, TinyInput, TinyNumeric, TinyButton } from '@opentiny/vue'
37-51: Add JSDoc comments for design configurationThe design configuration would benefit from documentation explaining the purpose of each component's configuration.
+/** + * Global design configuration for components + * @typedef {Object} DesignConfig + * @property {string} name - Design specification name + * @property {string} version - Design specification version + * @property {Object} components - Component-specific configurations + */ const design = { name: 'x-design', version: '1.0.0', components: { + /** + * Form component configuration + * @property {boolean} hideRequiredAsterisk - Hides the red asterisk for required fields + */ Form: { props: { hideRequiredAsterisk: true } }, + /** + * Button component configuration + * @property {number} resetTime - Time in milliseconds before button reset + * @property {boolean} round - Enables rounded corners on buttons + */ Button: { props: { resetTime: 0, round: true } },examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base.vue (1)
101-103: Consider making the form width responsive.The fixed width might not be optimal for all screen sizes. Consider using responsive units or media queries.
.demo-form { - width: 380px; + width: 100%; + max-width: 380px; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base-composition-api.vue(2 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base.vue(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base-composition-api.vue (3)
88-90: LGTM! Clean and simple styling
The scoped styling is appropriate for this demo component.
6-16:
Add form validation rules and improve field constraints
The form structure is missing validation rules and field constraints.
Add validation rules and improve the implementation:
- <tiny-form ref="ruleFormRef" :model="formData">
+ <tiny-form
+ ref="ruleFormRef"
+ :model="formData"
+ :rules="formRules">
<tiny-form-item label="年龄" prop="age" required>
- <tiny-numeric v-model="formData.age"></tiny-numeric>
+ <tiny-numeric
+ v-model="formData.age"
+ :min="0"
+ :max="150"
+ placeholder="请输入年龄">
+ </tiny-numeric>
</tiny-form-item>
<tiny-form-item label="姓名" prop="name" required>
- <tiny-input v-model="formData.name"></tiny-input>
+ <tiny-input
+ v-model="formData.name"
+ placeholder="请输入姓名">
+ </tiny-input>
</tiny-form-item>Add the following to the script section:
const formRules = {
age: [
{ required: true, message: '请输入年龄' },
{ type: 'number', min: 0, max: 150, message: '年龄必须在0-150之间' }
],
name: [
{ required: true, message: '请输入姓名' },
{ min: 2, max: 20, message: '姓名长度必须在2-20个字符之间' }
]
}77-83:
Improve form validation handling and data initialization
The current implementation swallows validation errors silently and uses string initialization for numeric fields.
-const handleSubmitPromise = () => {
- ruleFormRef.value.validate().catch(() => {})
+const handleSubmitPromise = async () => {
+ try {
+ await ruleFormRef.value.validate()
+ console.log('验证成功:', formData.value)
+ // TODO: Add your form submission logic here
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('验证失败:', error)
+ }
}
const formData = ref({
name: '',
- age: ''
+ age: null
})examples/sites/demos/pc/app/config-provider/base.vue (6)
5-5: Enhance the alert description to better document the config-provider capabilities.
The current description "全局配置组件的默认行为" (default behavior of global configuration component) is too generic. Consider expanding it to highlight key features and use cases.
23-32: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.
All imported components are properly utilized in the template.
38-43: LGTM! Components are properly registered.
Component registrations align with imports and template usage.
48-61: Add documentation for configuration options.
The design configuration lacks proper documentation explaining the purpose and impact of each setting. Consider adding detailed comments for better understanding.
86-88: LGTM! Form data structure is well-defined.
The data structure matches the form fields with appropriate initial values.
93-95:
Improve form validation error handling.
The current validation implementation silently catches and ignores validation errors. Consider providing user feedback for both success and failure cases.
handleSubmitPromise() {
- this.$refs.ruleFormRef.validate().catch(() => {})
+ this.$refs.ruleFormRef.validate()
+ .then(() => {
+ TinyModal.message({ type: 'success', message: '验证通过' })
+ })
+ .catch((errors) => {
+ TinyModal.message({ type: 'error', message: '请检查表单填写是否正确' })
+ console.error('Validation errors:', errors)
+ })
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
…entation
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores