Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 23, 2023. It is now read-only.

Revert PR 287 which added service tag #322

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2018
Merged

Conversation

tylerbenson
Copy link

@tylerbenson tylerbenson commented Dec 5, 2018

See opentracing/specification#131.

Until this gets resolved, I don't think it should be included in an official release.

Reverts #287.

Note, this is being merged into the v0.32.0 feature branch to be part of the next RC.

@tylerbenson tylerbenson force-pushed the revert-287-service-tag branch from 797b89f to 8476660 Compare December 6, 2018 00:07
@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

+1

*
* @see #PEER_SERVICE
*/
public static final StringTag SERVICE = new StringTag("service");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why can't this be deprecated instead of removed?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 here. This would be breaking things.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This tag was not present in 0.31.0, so this would only be a breaking change for someone using a unofficial build. That is the main reason I'm pushing to get it removed before 0.32.0 so it doesn't have to go through a deprecation period.

@tylerbenson tylerbenson merged commit 11bf4f5 into v0.32.0 Dec 6, 2018
@tylerbenson tylerbenson deleted the revert-287-service-tag branch December 6, 2018 17:01
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 8, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 76.793% when pulling 8476660 on revert-287-service-tag into d6f60dd on v0.32.0.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants