Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 23, 2023. It is now read-only.

Rename start_active_span() to start_active_scope(). #89

Open
wants to merge 18 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

carlosalberto
Copy link
Contributor

For your consideration ;)

@tedsuo @yurishkuro @palazzem @pglombardo @indrekj

carlosalberto and others added 16 commits February 16, 2018 03:32
…ing#64)

* add Scope/ScopeManager interfaces

* provide start_active_span and start_span with ScopeManager propagation

* updating docstrings and tests
This includes ThreadLocalScopeManager in the ext
submodule.
Python-examples import as testbed/ examples.
* Lint doc line lengths.
* More formatting.
* Apply a similar formatting as the requests library.
* Add proper documentation for MockTracer.

* Further small refinements.
* Prepare the scope manager in testbed for production usage.
* Mention the ScopeManager implementations in README.rst.
* Prepare the inline documentation for our scope managers.
@carlosalberto carlosalberto mentioned this pull request Jul 2, 2018
@palazzem
Copy link
Member

palazzem commented Jul 3, 2018

To avoid confusion, I would say to don't comment this PR and keep the conversation going in the other PR (opentracing/opentracing-ruby#36). We have already many thoughts there so I guess it's better to ignore the Python PR at the moment.

@tedsuo
Copy link
Member

tedsuo commented Jul 5, 2018

Good idea. 👍

@carlosalberto
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey all,

FYI: we will be postponing this change, and will release OT 2.0 today/tomorrow (Tuesday, July 10th).

We will iterate and will get proper feedback on the rest of the supported languages, and will deprecate later on as needed (this will also be covered as part of opentracing/specification#122)

Thanks for the feedback @indrekj and hope we can find a proper agreement rather soon ;)

@carlosalberto carlosalberto changed the base branch from v2.0.0 to master July 10, 2018 16:43
@carlosalberto
Copy link
Contributor Author

This could be actually affected by #107 - if we don't do any changes, then yeah, we could keep this renaming PR/iteration. Thoughts?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants