Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix and re-format test data #467

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2023
Merged

Conversation

m1kola
Copy link
Member

@m1kola m1kola commented Oct 18, 2023

Description

Different packages in the test data were sharing the same channel. It doesn't currently affect the test, but in real world this doesn't happen since channel belongs to only one package

Also there was a bit strange formatting of bundle structs.

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@m1kola m1kola added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 18, 2023
@m1kola m1kola requested a review from a team as a code owner October 18, 2023 12:03
Different packages in the test data were sharing the same channel.
It doesn't currently affect the test, but in real world this
doesn't happen since channel belongs to only one package

Also there was a bit strange formatting of bundle structs.

Signed-off-by: Mikalai Radchuk <mradchuk@redhat.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (e846ffb) 83.80% compared to head (0624069) 83.56%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #467      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.80%   83.56%   -0.24%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines         846      846              
==========================================
- Hits          709      707       -2     
- Misses         94       95       +1     
- Partials       43       44       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 65.72% <ø> (-0.24%) ⬇️
unit 76.58% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 18, 2023
@m1kola m1kola added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 18, 2023
@m1kola m1kola removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Oct 18, 2023
@m1kola m1kola added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 18, 2023
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 18, 2023
@m1kola m1kola added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 18, 2023
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit 617a685 Oct 18, 2023
11 of 12 checks passed
@m1kola m1kola deleted the fixup_test_data branch October 18, 2023 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants