Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Add ClusterExtension package uniqueness test #785

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2024

Conversation

m1kola
Copy link
Member

@m1kola m1kola commented Apr 25, 2024

Description

Follow up to #774

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

Signed-off-by: Mikalai Radchuk <mradchuk@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 25, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 25, 2024

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6fee898
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/662a6f867867da000870d87a
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-785--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

ocv1alpha1 "github.com/operator-framework/operator-controller/api/v1alpha1"
)

func TestClusterExtensionPackageUniqueness(t *testing.T) {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feels a bit like we are testing upstream Kubernetes... Is this test worth having?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On the other hand - I got CEL expression wrong at first while working on #774: I blocked edits :) Given that I think it makes sense.

@m1kola m1kola marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2024 15:08
@m1kola m1kola requested a review from a team as a code owner April 25, 2024 15:08
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 25, 2024
@m1kola m1kola mentioned this pull request Apr 25, 2024
4 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 25, 2024
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Apr 25, 2024

/approve

@tmshort tmshort enabled auto-merge April 25, 2024 17:45
@tmshort tmshort added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 25, 2024
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit 265d60d Apr 25, 2024
14 checks passed
@m1kola m1kola deleted the admission_tests branch April 26, 2024 08:05
@m1kola
Copy link
Member Author

m1kola commented Apr 26, 2024

I think I introduced a flake here. Example.

I'll look into it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants