Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Cleanups after bumping Rukpak #928

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2024

Conversation

varshaprasad96
Copy link
Member

This PR makes the following changes:

  1. Removes the use of a separate handler, given rukpak has now externalized its implementation.
  2. Removes the unpacking status, which is no longer required with the use of direct registry client.

Description

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2024 17:42
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 12, 2024

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3fa711f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/666a9573adc35f00087257fb
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-928--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.15%. Comparing base (543dc15) to head (3fa711f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #928      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.45%   79.15%   +1.70%     
==========================================
  Files          17       15       -2     
  Lines        1153     1084      -69     
==========================================
- Hits          893      858      -35     
+ Misses        181      157      -24     
+ Partials       79       69      -10     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 57.19% <100.00%> (+0.38%) ⬆️
unit 54.70% <33.33%> (+3.27%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

joelanford
joelanford previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2024
@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 12, 2024
@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jun 12, 2024
@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 12, 2024
@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jun 12, 2024
@varshaprasad96
Copy link
Member Author

Looks like #916 is causing merge conflicts when added to the queue. Will rebase this after #916 gets merged.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 12, 2024
This PR makes the following changes:
1. Removes the use of a separate handler, given rukpak has
   now externalized its implementation.
2. Removes the unpacking status, which is no longer required with
   the use of direct registry client.

Signed-off-by: Varsha Prasad Narsing <varshaprasad96@gmail.com>
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 13, 2024
@bentito bentito changed the title ✨ Clean ups after bumping Rukapk ✨ Clean ups after bumping Rukpak Jun 13, 2024
@bentito bentito changed the title ✨ Clean ups after bumping Rukpak ✨ Cleanups after bumping Rukpak Jun 13, 2024
@bentito
Copy link
Contributor

bentito commented Jun 13, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 13, 2024
@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@everettraven everettraven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good to me and seems reasonable to have #929 as a follow up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants