Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

Fix target namespace validation on conversion #892

Merged

Conversation

m1kola
Copy link
Member

@m1kola m1kola commented May 15, 2024

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Mikalai Radchuk <mradchuk@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 37.95%. Comparing base (31691d9) to head (b0efc1c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #892      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   37.27%   37.95%   +0.68%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines         845      843       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits          315      320       +5     
+ Misses        486      481       -5     
+ Partials       44       42       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@m1kola m1kola marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2024 14:49
@m1kola m1kola requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2024 14:49
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 15, 2024
@joelanford joelanford added this pull request to the merge queue May 15, 2024
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit bd62a21 May 15, 2024
10 checks passed
@m1kola m1kola deleted the fix_target_namespace_validation branch May 15, 2024 15:52
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants