Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate codebase to Kotlin 1.6 #4120

Closed
BenHenning opened this issue Jan 21, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4937
Closed

Migrate codebase to Kotlin 1.6 #4120

BenHenning opened this issue Jan 21, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4937
Assignees
Labels
bug End user-perceivable behaviors which are not desirable. Impact: Medium Moderate perceived user impact (non-blocking bugs and general improvements). Issue: Needs Clarification Indicates that an issue needs more detail in order to be able to be acted upon. Work: High It's not clear what the solution is. Z-ibt Temporary label for Ben to keep track of issues he's triaged.

Comments

@BenHenning
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@BenHenning BenHenning self-assigned this Jan 21, 2022
@Broppia Broppia added issue_type_bug Impact: Medium Moderate perceived user impact (non-blocking bugs and general improvements). labels Jun 13, 2022
@BenHenning BenHenning added Issue: Needs Clarification Indicates that an issue needs more detail in order to be able to be acted upon. Z-ibt Temporary label for Ben to keep track of issues he's triaged. issue_user_developer and removed issue_type_bug labels Sep 15, 2022
@seanlip seanlip added bug End user-perceivable behaviors which are not desirable. and removed issue_type_infrastructure labels Mar 28, 2023
BenHenning added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 3, 2023
This addresses TODOs for #4119 and #4120. It also updates TODOs on #3715
to #4463, instead, since these apparently weren't correctly originally.
@MohitGupta121 MohitGupta121 added the Work: High It's not clear what the solution is. label Jun 16, 2023
@BenHenning BenHenning changed the title Migrate codebase to Kotlin 1.6 [Blocked: #4119] Migrate codebase to Kotlin 1.6 May 23, 2024
BenHenning added a commit that referenced this issue May 28, 2024
## Explanation
Fixes #1535
Fixes part of #4120

This PR preps for the codebase-wide migration to Kotlin 1.6 (done in
#4937) by first upgrading rules_kotlin from 1.5.0 alpha 2 to 1.5.0 beta
3. This upgrade, while small, produces a few nice benefits:
- It removes the need for extra WORKSPACE dependency setup (thus
addressing #1535).
- It moves a bunch of rules_kotlin macros to new locations which results
in changing nearly every ``BUILD.bazel`` file in the codebase.

The changes are straightforward to review in isolation, so this PR acts
as a means to help reduce the complexity of #4937 by pulling ahead these
groups of ``BUILD.bazel`` changes while also moving rules_kotlin the
smallest number of versions (ahead of the more major upgrades which will
occur downstream).

Note that this change is needed because:
- We'll need to upgrade to a newer version of rules_kotlin in order to
bring in Kotlin 1.6 support.
- rules_kotlin moved these macros and using the old ones results in a
_lot_ of build warnings that spam the local console when trying to
build.

Separately, this PR includes some minor trailing space cleanup in
wiki/Oppia-Bazel-Setup-Instructions.md that was noticed when editing the
file (since my local development environment auto-strips trailing
spaces).

## Essential Checklist
- [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If
this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of
#bugnum: ...".)
- [x] Any changes to
[scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets)
files have their rationale included in the PR explanation.
- [x] The PR follows the [style
guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide).
- [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android
Studio
([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)).
- [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and
is up-to-date with "develop".
- [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers
([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)).

## For UI-specific PRs only
N/A -- This should only affect build infrastructure, and barely impact
resulting binary builds.

---------

Co-authored-by: Adhiambo Peres <59600948+adhiamboperes@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Lip <sean@seanlip.org>
BenHenning added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2024
…5402)

## Explanation
Fixes part of #4120
Fixes part of #1051

Similar to #5400, this brings forward changes that would otherwise go in
#4937 to simplify the transition to Kotlin 1.6.

Part of #4937 is introducing warnings-as-errors for both Kotlin and Java
in order to reduce developer error, simplify the codebase, and minimize
warnings when building (which can result in developer habits of ignoring
warnings that might have real consequences to end users of the app). In
order to keep the main migration PR smaller, this PR fixes all existing
warnings and any new ones detected with the Kotlin 1.6 compiler that are
not tied to Kotlin 1.5/1.6 API changes (those are part of #4937,
instead). Fortunately, most of the changes could be brought forward into
this PR.

Specific things to note:
- A few new issues were filed for SDK 33 deprecations caused, but not
noted by, #5222): #5404, #5405, and #5406 and corresponding TODOs added.
This PR opts for TODOs over actual fixes to minimize the amount of
manual verification needed, and to try and keep the PR more focused on
non-functional refactor changes (to reduce the risk as reverting this PR
may be difficult if an issue is introduced).
- A lot of the fixes were removing redundant casts or null checks.
- The old mechanism we used for view models is deprecated, and had a lot
of problems (partially documented in #1051). This PR moves the codebase
over to directly injecting view models instead of using the view model
provider (thus getting rid of true Jetpack view models entirely in the
codebase).
- We never used the Jetpack functionality, and we were leaking a lot of
context objects that could theoretically result in memory leaks.
- The migration of view models in this way has already been ongoing in
the codebase; this PR just finishes moving the rest of them over to
remove the deprecated JetPack view model reference.
- Note that this doesn't actually change the scope of the view models,
and in fact they should largely behave as they always have.
- ``ObservableViewModel`` was subsequently updated, and may be something
we could remove in the future now that it's no longer a Jetpack view
model.
- The old view model binding code was removed, along with its test file
exemptions. It's no longer used now that the view models have been
finished being migrated over to direct injection.
- Some of the binding adapters didn't correctly correspond to their
namespaced properties. I _think_ that the databinding compiler was still
hooking them up correctly, but they produced build warnings that have
now been addressed (specifically, 'app' is implied). Some other
properties were using unusual namespaces, so these were replaced with
'app' versions for consistency & correctness.
- Some cases where SAM interfaces could be converted to lambdas were
also addressed (mainly for ``Observer`` callbacks in UI code).
- ``DrawerLayout.setDrawerListener`` was replaced with calls to
``DrawerLayout.addDrawerListener`` since the former [is
deprecated](https://developer.android.com/reference/androidx/drawerlayout/widget/DrawerLayout#setDrawerListener(androidx.drawerlayout.widget.DrawerLayout.DrawerListener)).
This isn't expected to have a functional difference.
- Some other minor control flow warnings were addressed (such as dead
code paths).
- ``when`` cases were updated to be comprehensive (as this is enforced
starting in newer versions of Kotlin even for non-result based ``when``
statements).
- Some unused variables were removed and/or replaced with ``_`` per
Kotlin convention.
- Some parameter names needed to be updated to match their override
signatures.
- One change in ``ExitSurveyConfirmationDialogFragment`` involved
removing parsing a profile ID. Technically this is a semantic change
since now a crash isn't going to happen if the profile ID is missing or
incorrect, but that seems fine since the fragment doesn't even need a
profile ID to be passed.
- Some of the test activities were updated to bind a ``Runnable``
callback rather than binding to a method (just to avoid passing the
unused ``View`` parameter and to keep things a bit simple binding-wise).
- Some cases were fixed where variables were being shadowed due to
reused names in deeper scopes.
- There were some typing issues going on in tests with custom test
application components. This has been fixed by explicitly declaring the
application component types rather than them being implicit within the
generated Dagger code.
- ``getDrawable`` calls were updated to pass in a ``Theme`` since the
non-theme version is deprecated.
- Some Java property references were updated, too (i.e. using property
syntax instead of Java getters when referencing Java code in Kotlin).
- In some cases, deprecated APIs were suppressed since they're needed
for testing purposes.
- Mockito's ``verifyZeroInteractions`` has been deprecated in favor of
``verifyNoMoreInteractions``, so updates were made in tests accordingly.
- ``ExperimentalCoroutinesApi`` and ``InternalCoroutinesApi`` have been
deprecated in favor of a newer ``OptIn`` method (which can actually be
done via kotlinc arguments, but not in this PR). Thus, they've been
outright removed in cases where not needed, and otherwise migrated to
the ``OptIn`` approach where they do need to be declared.
- In some cases, Kotlin recommends using a ``toSet()`` conversion for
iterable operations when it's more performant, so some of those cases
(where noticed) have been addressed.
- Some unused parameter cases needed to be suppressed for situations
when Robolectric is using reflection to access them.
- In some cases Android Studio would recommend transformation chain
simplifications; these were adopted where obvious.
- There are a few new TODOs added on #3616 as well, to clean up
deprecated references that have been suppressed in this PR.
- ``BundleExtensions`` was updated to implement its own version of the
type-based ``getSerializable`` until such time as ``BundleCompat`` can
be used, instead (per #5405).
- A **lot** of nullability improvements needed to happen throughout the
JSON asset loading process since there was a lot of loose typing
happening there.
- Some Kotlin & OkHttp deprecated API references were also updated to
use their non-deprecated replacements.
- ``NetworkLoggingInterceptorTest`` was majorly reworked to ensure that
the assertions would actually run (``runBlockingTest`` was being used
which is deprecated, and something I try to avoid since it's very
difficult to write tests that use it correctly). My investigations
showed that the assertions weren't being called, so these tests would
never fail. The new versions will always run the assertions or fail
before reaching them, and fortunately the code under test passes the
assertions correctly. Ditto for ``ConsoleLoggerTest``.
- Some parts of ``SurveyProgressController`` were reworked to have
better typing management and to reduce the need for nullability
management.
- Some generic typing trickiness needed to be fixed ahead of the Kotlin
version upgrade in ``UrlImageParser``. See file comments & links in
those comments for more context.
- ``BundleExtensionsTest`` had to be changed since
``getSerializableExtra`` is now deprecated. We also can't update the
test to run SDK 33 since that requires upgrading Robolectric, and
Robolectric can't be upgraded without upgrading other dependencies that
eventually lead to needing to upgrade both Kotlin and Bazel (so it's a
non-starter; this is a workaround until we can actually move to a newer
version of Robolectric).
- There was some minor code-deduplication & cleanup done in
``ClickableAreasImage``.
- Some incorrect comments were removed in tests (to the effect of "using
not-allowed-listed variables should result in a failure."). These seemed
to have been copied from an earlier test, but the later tests weren't
actually verifying that behavior so the comment wasn't correct.
- An unused method was removed from ``ConceptCardRetriever``
(``createWrittenTranslationFromJson``) and some other small
cleanup/consolidation work happened in that class.
- Some stylistic changes were done in ``TopicController`` for JSON
loading to better manage nullable situations, and to try and make the
JSON loading code slightly more Kotlin idiomatic.

Note that overall the PR has relied **heavily** on tooling to detect
warnings to fix, and automated tests to verify that the changes have no
side effects.

Note also that this PR does not actually enable warnings-as-errors; that
will happen in a downstream PR.

## Essential Checklist
- [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If
this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of
#bugnum: ...".)
- [x] Any changes to
[scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets)
files have their rationale included in the PR explanation.
- [x] The PR follows the [style
guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide).
- [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android
Studio
([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)).
- [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and
is up-to-date with "develop".
- [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers
([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)).

## For UI-specific PRs only
N/A -- While this changes UI code, it should change very few UI
behaviors and only failure cases for those it does affect. It's largely
infrastructural-only and falls mainly under refactoring/cleanup work.

---------

Co-authored-by: Adhiambo Peres <59600948+adhiamboperes@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Lip <sean@seanlip.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug End user-perceivable behaviors which are not desirable. Impact: Medium Moderate perceived user impact (non-blocking bugs and general improvements). Issue: Needs Clarification Indicates that an issue needs more detail in order to be able to be acted upon. Work: High It's not clear what the solution is. Z-ibt Temporary label for Ben to keep track of issues he's triaged.
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants