-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cache automorphism groups of number fields #2436
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2436 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 71.62% 71.59% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 395 393 -2
Lines 53023 52905 -118
==========================================
- Hits 37979 37877 -102
+ Misses 15044 15028 -16
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fine by me, though I note that none of the new code is exercised by any tests -- because almost none of the existing code in this file has code coverage
Since this is in experimental, that's OK, though I note that a few simple tests would help prevent us from accidentally breaking this code
and related: - aut grp local fields - IdelClassGmodule - allow for use of lll-order by changeing ideal parents - galois group via cohomolgy: make sure the rcf is normal
Hm, why |
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 04:06:47AM -0700, Tommy Hofmann wrote:
Hm, why `(PermGroup,)` and not just `PermGroup` as the key?
So it's a tuple
either
PermGroup, of length 1
or
PermGroup, field of length 2 if one needs a relative aut grup
…
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#2436 (comment)
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
and related: