Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

uint: bump version to 0.7 #136

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 11, 2019
Merged

uint: bump version to 0.7 #136

merged 6 commits into from
May 11, 2019

Conversation

ordian
Copy link
Member

@ordian ordian commented May 8, 2019

to incorporate #126

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
[package]
name = "ethereum-types"
version = "0.5.0"
version = "0.5.1"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So the policy for dependent crates is to bump the the patch when updating a dependency?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we have a hard policy on that but I think it's a good practise if applied sensibly? Do you see any downsides?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems fine to me - was just curious what our convention was

Copy link
Member Author

@ordian ordian May 8, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that depends on whether the change is breaking, I don't think it is for ethereum-types and primitive-types, but please correct me if I'm wrong.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or if you mean in general, I don't think we should do this in every case, but I'd like to publish new version of primitive-types as well.

Copy link
Contributor

@ascjones ascjones May 8, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes of course my original comment is poorly phrased. Just when I've updated a dependency like this in the past (non breaking minor version) I was unsure about the correct bump for the parent crate.

Copy link
Member Author

@ordian ordian May 8, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sorpaas it seems like latest versions of ethereum-types were published from primitives repo. Can you confirm if that's correct? What's the purpose of ethereum-types in parity-common if so?

Copy link
Contributor

@dvdplm dvdplm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you also update the readme? It mentions v0.6. Also perhaps add info about the new fuzzing tests?

@ordian ordian merged commit bf0c9d3 into master May 11, 2019
@ordian ordian deleted the ao-uint-0.7 branch May 11, 2019 12:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants