-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 743
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
XCM Weights/Benchmarks TODOs #1132
Comments
reserve_asset_deposited
IIRC the first item is hardcoded that way in order to make the benchmarking of |
@KiChjang
|
|
@franciscoaguirre
maybe we could get rid of that, do you have any idea how? maybe relates to paritytech/polkadot#7077 |
* Compatibility fix for xcm benchmarks (cause of missing companion) * ".git/.scripts/commands/bench/bench.sh" --subcommand=xcm --runtime=asset-hub-polkadot --runtime_dir=assets --target_dir=cumulus --pallet=pallet_xcm_benchmarks::fungible * Fix for reserve_asset_deposited (https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/issues/1974) * Revert back hard-coded 1_000_000_000_u64 for `reserve_asset_deposited` with TODOs * ".git/.scripts/commands/bench/bench.sh" --subcommand=xcm --runtime=asset-hub-kusama --runtime_dir=assets --target_dir=cumulus --pallet=pallet_xcm_benchmarks::fungible --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
…orted_asset` benchmarks (#1726) # Description ## Summary Previously, the `pallet_xcm::do_reserve_transfer_assets` and `pallet_xcm::do_teleport_assets` functions relied on weight estimation for remote chain execution, which was based on guesswork derived from the local chain. This approach led to complications for runtimes that did not provide or support specific [XCM configurations](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76ef8fd2aabf9f07de0156941ce3ed44b0/polkadot/xcm/xcm-executor/src/config.rs#L43-L47) for `IsReserve` or `IsTeleporter`. Consequently, such runtimes had to resort to implementing hard-coded weights for XCM instructions like `reserve_asset_deposited` or `receive_teleported_asset` to support extrinsics such as `pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets` and `pallet_xcm::teleport_assets`, which depended on remote weight estimation. The issue of remote weight estimation was addressed and resolved by [Pull Request #1645](#1645), which removed the need for remote weight estimation. ## Solution As a continuation of this improvement, the current PR proposes further cleanup by removing unnecessary hard-coded values and rectifying benchmark results with `Weight::MAX` that previously used `T::BlockWeights::get().max_block` as an override for unsupported XCM instructions like `ReserveAssetDeposited` and `ReceiveTeleportedAsset`. ## Questions - [x] Can we remove now also `Hardcoded till the XCM pallet is fixed` for `deposit_asset`? E.g. for AssetHubKusama [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76ef8fd2aabf9f07de0156941ce3ed44b0/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/assets/asset-hub-kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L129-L134) - [x] Are comments like [this](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76ef8fd2aabf9f07de0156941ce3ed44b0/polkadot/runtime/kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L94) `// Kusama doesn't support ReserveAssetDeposited, so this benchmark has a default weight` still relevant? Shouldnt be removed/changed? ## TODO - [x] `bench bot` regenerate xcm weights for all runtimes - [x] remove hard-coded stuff from system parachain weight files - [ ] when merged, open `polkadot-fellow/runtimes` PR ## References Fixes #1132 Closes #1132 Old polkadot repo [PR](paritytech/polkadot#7546) --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
TODO
parachains/runtimes/assests/
- check fixfn reserve_asset_deposited(
weight correctly, now is hardcoded1_000_000_000
// Hardcoded till the XCM pallet is fixed
and fixThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: