-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 688
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add recorded_keys
function to get recorded keys from the proof recorder
#2561
Merged
bkchr
merged 3 commits into
paritytech:master
from
ParthDesai:add-recorded-keys-fn-in-proof-recorder
Dec 1, 2023
Merged
Add recorded_keys
function to get recorded keys from the proof recorder
#2561
bkchr
merged 3 commits into
paritytech:master
from
ParthDesai:add-recorded-keys-fn-in-proof-recorder
Dec 1, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bkchr
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2023
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
ggwpez
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2023
1 task
skunert
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2023
michalkucharczyk
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2023
@bkchr Review bot is still failing. How can we fix it? |
I pinged it internally to get approval for the bot. But maybe Basti force merges it 😉 |
bgallois
pushed a commit
to duniter/duniter-polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2024
…rder (paritytech#2561) # Description - What does this PR do? This PR adds function to get recorded keys from proof recorder instance - Why are these changes needed? This change is required to get the keys accessed by the trie backend during the runtime execution. The keys are already tracked by proof recorder, just aren't exposed publicly. - How were these changes implemented and what do they affect? The changes are implemented by adding a public function in proof recorder that simply clones the `recorded_keys` field. It is pure addition of function and AFAIK does not affect anything. # Checklist - [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the "Description" section above - [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements](CONTRIBUTING.md#Process) of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required) - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable) - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if applicable) --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR adds function to get recorded keys from proof recorder instance
This change is required to get the keys accessed by the trie backend during the runtime execution. The keys are already tracked by proof recorder, just aren't exposed publicly.
The changes are implemented by adding a public function in proof recorder that simply clones the
recorded_keys
field. It is pure addition of function and AFAIK does not affect anything.Checklist
T
required)