Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

Add tracing support to node #1940

Merged
merged 37 commits into from
Nov 20, 2020
Merged

Add tracing support to node #1940

merged 37 commits into from
Nov 20, 2020

Conversation

coriolinus
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A3-in_progress Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage. label Nov 10, 2020
@coriolinus coriolinus added B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders. labels Nov 11, 2020
@coriolinus coriolinus marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2020 15:18
@github-actions github-actions bot added A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. and removed A3-in_progress Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage. labels Nov 12, 2020
@coriolinus
Copy link
Contributor Author

bot merge

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 20, 2020

Missing process info; check that the PR belongs to a project column.

Merge can be attempted if:

  • The PR has approval from two core-devs (or one if the PR is labelled insubstantial).
  • The PR has approval from a member of substrateteamleads.
  • The PR is attached to a project column and has approval from the project owner.

See https://github.com/paritytech/parity-processbot#faq

@coriolinus coriolinus merged commit f7ea3d0 into master Nov 20, 2020
@coriolinus coriolinus deleted the prgn-tracing branch November 20, 2020 11:02
info!(
block_number = %block,
delay = %delay,
"GRANDPA scheduled voting pause set for block #{} with a duration of {} blocks.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry for being late to the party

there are a few places left where we print the data both in the message and via structured logging and it's not clear to me whether we need the former and what is the best practice here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In cases like this where I retained both, it's because it wasn't immediately clear how to rewrite the message while preserving clarity.

ordian added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2020
* master:
  Improve collator side of the collator-protocol (#1955)
  add parity-keyring to install instructions (#1993)
  sane messaging defaults (#1994)
  cleanup validator discovery (#1992)
  Add Prometheus timers to the subsystems (#1923)
  Add tracing support to node (#1940)
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants