Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support tso service #1038

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Support tso service #1038

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rleungx
Copy link
Member

@rleungx rleungx commented Jan 11, 2023

Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung rleungx@gmail.com

Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <rleungx@gmail.com>
@rleungx rleungx marked this pull request as ready for review January 12, 2023 07:40
@rleungx rleungx added the DNM Do Not Merge label Jan 12, 2023
@rleungx
Copy link
Member Author

rleungx commented Jan 13, 2023

@binshi-bing Would you like to take a look?

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
syntax = "proto3";
package tsopb;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to our last sync, my understanding is that we'll provide these APIs as storage interface used by tso service internal.

option (gogoproto.unmarshaler_all) = true;
option (rustproto.lite_runtime_all) = true;

service Tso {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This service is to provide TSO storage. Shall we call it TsoStorage to differentiate it from the TSO service which provide GetTSs?

Copy link
Contributor

@binshi-bing binshi-bing left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Though we don't need this change for now, this is my first review for PD.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DNM Do Not Merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants