Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

config: disable local latch by default #12068

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 9, 2019
Merged

Conversation

jackysp
Copy link
Member

@jackysp jackysp commented Sep 7, 2019

Signed-off-by: Shuaipeng Yu jackysp@gmail.com

What problem does this PR solve?

The local latch has a large memory usage for TiDB when importing data. In addition, there is a problem of inconsistency in the error message of the write conflict. After TiDB 3.0 supported pessimistic transaction, its role in reducing conflicts was also weakened. So, it is best to turn it off by default.

What is changed and how it works?

Turn it off by default.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Code changes

  • Has exported function/method change

Related changes

  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch
  • Need to update the tidb-ansible repository

Signed-off-by: Shuaipeng Yu <jackysp@gmail.com>
@jackysp jackysp added type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement. needs-cherry-pick-3.0 labels Sep 7, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 7, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #12068 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             master     #12068   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage   81.4778%   81.4778%           
===========================================
  Files           448        448           
  Lines         95939      95939           
===========================================
  Hits          78169      78169           
  Misses        12200      12200           
  Partials       5570       5570

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor

LTGM @winkyao

@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Sep 9, 2019
@coocood
Copy link
Member

coocood commented Sep 9, 2019

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@AndreMouche AndreMouche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. labels Sep 9, 2019
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 9, 2019

/run-all-tests

@sre-bot sre-bot merged commit e19138f into pingcap:master Sep 9, 2019
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 9, 2019

cherry pick to release-3.0 in PR #12095

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants