Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expression: refactor functions to build expressions #50997

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #50996

We have many functions to build expressions, but it is unclear which we should use for a certain case and some codes in these functions are duplicated. It's better to refactor them to make it clear.

What changed and how does it work?

In this PR, we provide two groups of functions to build expressions.

The first function group is exposed in the package expression and used to build simple expressions. The "simple" means they do not include some special expressions such as subquery. Here we simplified to 3 functions:

  • expression.BuildSimpleExpr: build a simple expression from an AST node.
  • expression.ParseSimpleExpr: parse a string and then build a simple expression
  • expression.EvalSimpleAst: build a simple expression from an AST node and evaluate it directly.

The first group requires limited context and can be used in some places where you do not want to introduce too many dependencies. However, if you need to build some complex expressions like subquery, we should use the second group. The second group is exposed in the package planner/util and can build any expression. However, it requires the full context of a planner. These functions includes:

  • util.RewriteAstExprWithPlanCtx: build an expression with the plan context
  • util.EvalAstExprWithPlanCtx: evaluates an expression directly with the plan context
  • util.ParseExprWithPlanCtx: parse an expression from the string with the plan context

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 6, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Feb 6, 2024

Hi @lcwangchao. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2024

Codecov Report

Merging #50997 (b624542) into master (8988b4c) will increase coverage by 2.1190%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 85.0000%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #50997        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   70.5150%   72.6341%   +2.1190%     
================================================
  Files          1467       1467                
  Lines        434890     434896         +6     
================================================
+ Hits         306663     315883      +9220     
+ Misses       108910      99077      -9833     
- Partials      19317      19936       +619     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 48.9826% <80.8333%> (?)
unit 70.2855% <80.0000%> (-0.0101%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 54.2940% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 51.2177% <100.0000%> (+5.5058%) ⬆️

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Feb 6, 2024
Copy link
Member

@YangKeao YangKeao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Feb 6, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Feb 6, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-02-06 02:33:19.744746258 +0000 UTC m=+237725.311516147: ☑️ agreed by lance6716.
  • 2024-02-06 07:44:00.347876263 +0000 UTC m=+256365.914646169: ☑️ agreed by YangKeao.

pkg/planner/core/expression_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/planner/core/expression_rewriter.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Feb 7, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lance6716, mjonss, XuHuaiyu, YangKeao, zimulala

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Feb 7, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 526d738 into pingcap:master Feb 7, 2024
21 checks passed
@lcwangchao lcwangchao deleted the simple_rewriter branch February 7, 2024 03:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

refactor methods to provide more clear interfaces to to build expressions
6 participants