-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: fix CTE hang or wrong result when multiple Apply is used #55553
Conversation
Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <shaoge1994@163.com>
Hi @guo-shaoge. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #55553 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 72.8423% 74.9432% +2.1008%
================================================
Files 1572 1586 +14
Lines 440056 454220 +14164
================================================
+ Hits 320547 340407 +19860
+ Misses 99747 93210 -6537
- Partials 19762 20603 +841
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
/hold |
@guo-shaoge: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, hawkingrei, XuHuaiyu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
/run-cherry-picker |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #55551
Problem Summary:
ExtractOuterApplyCorrelatedCols
is used to find all correlated columns which is inside CTE definition and its corresponding Apply is outside of CTE definition. Check the following diagram,ExtractOuterApplyCorrelatedCols
should NOT returncor_col_3
, becausecor_col_3
's corresponding Apply isApply_3
, which is inside CTE definition.Why need
ExtractOuterApplyCorrelatedCols
: For those CTE whose result ofExtractOuterApplyCorrelatedCols(CTE_definition)
is not empty, we need to re-compute the definition of CTE.What changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.