txn: use handle to encode checksum instead of the key (#57139)

[ti-chi-bot]

This is an automated cherry-pick of #57139

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #57174

Problem Summary:

When BR restore data, they may alter the key, but the checksum part in the value not touched.
Since the checksum is calculated based on the value and key toghter, so the checksum verification may wrong since using the altered key.

What changed and how does it work?

Using handle to calculate checksum, to skip the table id change problem. The handle is not changed.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 58.82353% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (release-8.5@4fb27d5). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-8.5     #57186   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage               ?   56.9265%           
================================================
  Files                  ?       1780           
  Lines                  ?     640432           
  Branches               ?          0           
================================================
  Hits                   ?     364576           
  Misses                 ?     251760           
  Partials               ?      24096           

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	37.7058% <11.7647%> (?)
unit	73.1006% <58.8235%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.9478% <0.0000%> (?)
parser	∅ <0.0000%> (?)
br	52.5528% <0.0000%> (?)

[3AceShowHand]

/retest

[3AceShowHand]

/retest

[3AceShowHand]

/retest

[3AceShowHand]

/test pull-unit-test-ddlv1

[tiprow]

@3AceShowHand: No presubmit jobs available for pingcap/tidb@release-8.5

In response to this:

/test pull-unit-test-ddlv1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[GMHDBJD]

LGTM

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-11-08 08:29:51.559364638 +0000 UTC m=+1202504.398520185: ☑️ agreed by 3AceShowHand.
• 2024-11-14 06:12:27.282843081 +0000 UTC m=+509509.473712071: ☑️ agreed by GMHDBJD.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 3AceShowHand, GMHDBJD, tangenta

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [3AceShowHand,GMHDBJD,tangenta]
• pkg/ddl/OWNERS [GMHDBJD,tangenta]
• pkg/table/OWNERS [GMHDBJD,tangenta]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment