-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support replay command to enhance checkpoint #1157
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1157 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 52.32% 47.86% -4.46%
==========================================
Files 286 288 +2
Lines 20341 20396 +55
==========================================
- Hits 10643 9763 -880
- Misses 8026 8954 +928
- Partials 1672 1679 +7
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
313b156
to
7ed712a
Compare
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by writing |
…into enhanced-checkpoint
What problem does this PR solve?
In #1069, we support checkpoint, however, the user must guarantee the inpute command is exactly identical with the one before, which is not comfortable.
What is changed and how it works?
Introduce
tiup cluster replay
andtiup dm replay
commands, which need only one argument: the audit id. And we will found the previous command and replay it via the audit id.Check List
Tests
Code changes
Side effects
Related changes
Release notes: