[WIP]: Fix coverage calculation in CI

[c-peters]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.06%. Comparing base (0e63403) to head (03c7f45).
Report is 24 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 03c7f45 differs from pull request most recent head 0551734. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0551734 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14689      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.92%   81.06%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files        1328     1322       -6     
  Lines      173446   171348    -2098     
  Branches     2455     2460       +5     
==========================================
- Hits       140369   138905    -1464     
+ Misses      32605    31973     -632     
+ Partials      472      470       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[nameexhaustion]

Limiting CMAKE_BUILD_PARALLEL_LEVEL seems to work (I tried 10) while keeping zlib-ng - https://github.com/pola-rs/polars/actions/runs/8063282434/job/22024774215?pr=14715.

I think this is also be the same reason why the python release is failing for the macOS workflows.

[c-peters]

Limiting CMAKE_BUILD_PARALLEL_LEVEL seems to work (I tried 10) while keeping zlib-ng - https://github.com/pola-rs/polars/actions/runs/8063282434/job/22024774215?pr=14715.

I think this is also be the same reason why the python release is failing for the macOS workflows.

Great! Could not find how to alter the cmake build, but that was exactly what I was looking for!

[c-peters]

Closing this in favor of #14715