Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

oidc/services: use PyJWK directly #16430

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 7, 2024

Conversation

woodruffw
Copy link
Member

Follows #16378 -- not exactly a dramatic change, but pyjwt==2.9.0 and newer allow us to use the PyJWK directly rather than poking through it for the underlying public key 🙂

Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@trailofbits.com>
@woodruffw woodruffw requested a review from a team as a code owner August 7, 2024 20:10
@woodruffw woodruffw self-assigned this Aug 7, 2024
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@trailofbits.com>
@woodruffw woodruffw requested a review from miketheman August 7, 2024 20:29
@miketheman miketheman merged commit d5c0db7 into pypi:main Aug 7, 2024
17 checks passed
@woodruffw woodruffw deleted the ww/one-less-getattr branch August 7, 2024 20:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants