-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-104882: Docs: fix description of relationship between socket.getblocking()
and socket.gettimeout()
#105026
Conversation
- Change so that docs properly equate this with socket.gettimeout() != 0.
WIP: temp commit
This issue with the documentation goes back to v3.7. |
Will this automatically get marked for review or do I need to do anything special here? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
socket.getblocking()
and socket.gettimeout()
Thanks @joegeisbauer for the PR, and @AlexWaygood for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11, 3.12. |
…t.getblocking()` and `socket.gettimeout()` (pythonGH-105026) (cherry picked from commit 5a5ed7a) Co-authored-by: Joe Geisbauer <joegeisbauer@gmail.com>
GH-105283 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
GH-105284 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
…t.getblocking()` and `socket.gettimeout()` (pythonGH-105026) (cherry picked from commit 5a5ed7a) Co-authored-by: Joe Geisbauer <joegeisbauer@gmail.com>
Thanks @joegeisbauer! I've merged the PR, and backported it to 3.12 and 3.11. Earlier versions of Python now only accept patches if they relate to security issues (which this isn't!), so it won't be backported to 3.10 or earlier. I removed the NEWS entry before merging, as we don't usually include them for docs-only changes :-) |
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--105026.org.readthedocs.build/