-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-112087: Update list_get_item_ref to optimistically avoid locking #116353
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
eda29bc
gh-112087: Update list_get_item_ref to optimistically avoid locking
corona10 9071dd4
Update
corona10 f0999f8
Address code review partially
corona10 d5b7723
Address code review
corona10 f03efb2
Update Objects/listobject.c
corona10 d5d39ec
fix
corona10 2dc7762
Add assertion
corona10 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is okay for now, but we need to store the capacity at the start of the
ob_item
allocation in the free-threaded build.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We may need to create a issue for tracking this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's necessary for thread-safety so I think it's covered by #112087
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By the way, we already store the
op->allocated
at theob_item
allocation.So adding assertion will be enough?
assert(cap != -1 && cap >= size);
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cpython/Objects/listobject.c
Lines 207 to 208 in 72714c0
cpython/Objects/listobject.c
Line 119 in 72714c0
cpython/Objects/listobject.c
Line 97 in 72714c0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We currently store it in the
PyListObject
. We also need to store it in the same memory allocation as theob_item
array, like a pre-header.Here are some pointers to the relevant code in nogil-3.12:
The problem with the current code is that the list may be resized concurrently with the access. The bounds check may be stale. Putting the value of "allocated" as an immutable field avoids this problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I got it. I understood what you want to say. Let's handle it at a separate PR.