Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gh-82504: deprecate the MultiLoopChildWatcher #94648

Closed
wants to merge 16 commits into from

Conversation

graingert
Copy link
Contributor

@graingert graingert commented Jul 7, 2022

@graingert graingert changed the title bpo-82504: deprecate the MultiLoopChildWatcher gh-82504: deprecate the MultiLoopChildWatcher Jul 7, 2022
@graingert graingert marked this pull request as ready for review July 7, 2022 09:18
@graingert graingert requested review from 1st1 and asvetlov as code owners July 7, 2022 09:18
Copy link
Contributor

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be better to add What's New entry about this deprecation.

…tYAz.rst

Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>
Doc/whatsnew/3.12.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@graingert graingert force-pushed the deprecate-multi-loop-watcher branch from 84a0ca0 to 2e6e996 Compare July 18, 2022 16:20
@graingert graingert requested a review from kumaraditya303 July 18, 2022 16:21
Copy link
Contributor

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@graingert
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks for the review @kumaraditya303 !

@kumaraditya303
Copy link
Contributor

@gvanrossum Would you like to review this? This deprecates MultiLoopChildWatcher which has race conditions so it is not even tested on CI currently, skipped on CI as of #26542.

@gvanrossum
Copy link
Member

I'm sorry, I don't feel comfortable reviewing this. Any core dev CC'ed on the issue would be more qualified than me.

@gvanrossum gvanrossum removed their request for review July 18, 2022 23:12
@graingert
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kumaraditya303 can you request @njsmith on this?

@kumaraditya303
Copy link
Contributor

kumaraditya303 commented Oct 9, 2022

Superseded by #98089

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants