Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ts type annotations #2384

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 6, 2023
Merged

Conversation

josephcalise
Copy link
Contributor

@josephcalise josephcalise commented Jun 1, 2023

Description

Please read our CONTRIBUTING.md prior to creating your first pull request.

Please include a summary of the feature or issue being fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

  • I included type annotations for the two functions in the file, I will continue to work on other files as I understand the returns and params.

Fixes part of #1512

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • Addition of type annotations.

Feature/Issue validation/testing

Please describe the Unit or Integration tests that you ran to verify your changes and relevant result summary. Provide instructions so it can be reproduced.
Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.

Completed mypy test stated on the issue.

  • Test A
    Logs for Test A

  • Test B
    Logs for Test B

Checklist:

  • Did you have fun?
  • Have you added tests that prove your fix is effective or that this feature works?
  • Has code been commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas?
  • Have you made corresponding changes to the documentation?

@msaroufim
Copy link
Member

Thanks @josephcalise please make sure to also add your file here https://github.com/pytorch/serve/blob/master/mypy.ini#L4

@josephcalise
Copy link
Contributor Author

@msaroufim sorry for the misunderstanding, is this what you mean?

Screenshot 2023-06-01 at 3 24 11 PM

@msaroufim
Copy link
Member

Yep that's right it's just to make sure that the type annotation job actually runs in CI

@josephcalise
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should be added! Thank you for your patience and guidance @msaroufim!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 2, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2384 (71c41fb) into master (28a2525) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

❗ Current head 71c41fb differs from pull request most recent head c632ce6. Consider uploading reports for the commit c632ce6 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2384      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.92%   72.01%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          78       78              
  Lines        3647     3648       +1     
  Branches       58       58              
==========================================
+ Hits         2623     2627       +4     
+ Misses       1020     1017       -3     
  Partials        4        4              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
ts/model_server.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@msaroufim
Copy link
Member

LGTM and thank you! Feel free to send out more!

@msaroufim
Copy link
Member

@mreso @agunapal could you please merge?

@msaroufim msaroufim merged commit 08a9093 into pytorch:master Jun 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants