Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Package statements that do not correspond to the project directory structure #1116

Closed
e210 opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
is:bug Bugs to fix needs:review Needs review / investigation

Comments

@e210
Copy link
Contributor

e210 commented Apr 8, 2024

The classes in the directory quartz/src/main/java/org/quartz/ee/jboss are referencing a package that does not match the actual structure.
While not strictly mandated by the Java language, it's considered good practice.

@jhouserizer jhouserizer added the needs:review Needs review / investigation label Oct 14, 2024
@jhouserizer
Copy link
Contributor

That's just weird and yucky. Many years of precedence of it now for those files... will ponder about correcting it.

@jhouserizer jhouserizer self-assigned this Oct 16, 2024
@jhouserizer jhouserizer added the is:bug Bugs to fix label Oct 16, 2024
@bcode2
Copy link
Contributor

bcode2 commented Oct 16, 2024

Yeaa, quite strange that the bug is so old. I have just push a PR regarding this issue

jhouserizer added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2024
fix #1116: Move classes to the correct folder following java recommended package naming conventions
bcode2 added a commit to bcode2/quartz that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2024
…ng java recommended package naming conventions

Signed-off-by: Carlos Garcia <bcode@protonmail.com>
jhouserizer added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2024
fix: #1116-Move classes to the correct folder
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
is:bug Bugs to fix needs:review Needs review / investigation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants