Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pip install numbuf. #8

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2016
Merged

Pip install numbuf. #8

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2016

Conversation

robertnishihara
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@pcmoritz pcmoritz merged commit 09a3ff7 into master Oct 28, 2016
@robertnishihara robertnishihara deleted the numbuf branch October 31, 2016 18:37
pcmoritz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2016
* Add setup.py and travis.

* Add script to install dependencies for travis.

* Put Arrow into thirdparty.

* Add .gitmodules file.

* Install boost dependencies.

* Make tests verbose.

* Build arrow and numbuf in setup.py.

* Change build_ext to install.

* Switch develop to install in pip.

* Test

* fix numbuf build and installation

* make import numbuf work

* fix documentation

* fix tests

* quotes
devin-petersohn pushed a commit to devin-petersohn/ray that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2018
…l(), and count() (ray-project#8)

* cleanup and fixing eval

* fixed eval and ffill dataframe functions

* changing _col_index entries during eval

* small change to documentation for applymap()
devin-petersohn pushed a commit to devin-petersohn/ray that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2018
…l(), and count() (ray-project#8)

* cleanup and fixing eval

* fixed eval and ffill dataframe functions

* changing _col_index entries during eval

* small change to documentation for applymap()
bentzinir pushed a commit to bentzinir/ray that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2020
bentzinir pushed a commit to bentzinir/ray that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2020
kfstorm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2022
We encountered SIGSEGV when running Python test `python/ray/tests/test_failure_2.py::test_list_named_actors_timeout`. The stack is:

```
#0  0x00007fffed30f393 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) ()
   from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6
#1  0x00007fffee707649 in ray::RayLog::GetLoggerName() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
#2  0x00007fffee70aa90 in ray::SpdLogMessage::Flush() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
#3  0x00007fffee70af28 in ray::RayLog::~RayLog() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
#4  0x00007fffee2b570d in ray::asio::testing::(anonymous namespace)::DelayManager::Init() [clone .constprop.0] ()
   from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
#5  0x00007fffedd0d95a in _GLOBAL__sub_I_asio_chaos.cc () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
#6  0x00007ffff7fe282a in call_init.part () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#7  0x00007ffff7fe2931 in _dl_init () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#8  0x00007ffff7fe674c in dl_open_worker () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#9  0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#10 0x00007ffff7fe5ffe in _dl_open () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#11 0x00007ffff7d5f39c in dlopen_doit () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
#12 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#13 0x00007ffff7b82f13 in _dl_catch_error () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#14 0x00007ffff7d5fb09 in _dlerror_run () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
#15 0x00007ffff7d5f42a in dlopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
#16 0x00007fffef04d330 in py_dl_open (self=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>)
    at /tmp/python-build.20220507135524.257789/Python-3.7.11/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c:1369
```

The root cause is that when loading `_raylet.so`, `static DelayManager _delay_manager` is initialized and `RAY_LOG(ERROR) << "RAY_testing_asio_delay_us is set to " << delay_env;` is executed. However, the static variables declared in `logging.cc` are not initialized yet (in this case, `std::string RayLog::logger_name_ = "ray_log_sink"`).

It's better not to rely on the initialization order of static variables in different compilation units because it's not guaranteed. I propose to change all `RAY_LOG`s to `std::cerr` in `DelayManager::Init()`.

The crash happens in Ant's internal codebase. Not sure why this test case passes in the community version though.

BTW, I've tried different approaches:

1. Using a static local variable in `get_delay_us` and remove the global variable. This doesn't work because `init()` needs to access the variable as well.
2. Defining the global variable as type `std::unique_ptr<DelayManager>` and initialize it in `get_delay_us`. This works but it requires a lock to be thread-safe.
Rohan138 pushed a commit to Rohan138/ray that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2022
We encountered SIGSEGV when running Python test `python/ray/tests/test_failure_2.py::test_list_named_actors_timeout`. The stack is:

```
#0  0x00007fffed30f393 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) ()
   from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6
ray-project#1  0x00007fffee707649 in ray::RayLog::GetLoggerName() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
ray-project#2  0x00007fffee70aa90 in ray::SpdLogMessage::Flush() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
ray-project#3  0x00007fffee70af28 in ray::RayLog::~RayLog() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
ray-project#4  0x00007fffee2b570d in ray::asio::testing::(anonymous namespace)::DelayManager::Init() [clone .constprop.0] ()
   from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
ray-project#5  0x00007fffedd0d95a in _GLOBAL__sub_I_asio_chaos.cc () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
ray-project#6  0x00007ffff7fe282a in call_init.part () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
ray-project#7  0x00007ffff7fe2931 in _dl_init () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
ray-project#8  0x00007ffff7fe674c in dl_open_worker () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
ray-project#9  0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6
ray-project#10 0x00007ffff7fe5ffe in _dl_open () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
ray-project#11 0x00007ffff7d5f39c in dlopen_doit () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
ray-project#12 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6
ray-project#13 0x00007ffff7b82f13 in _dl_catch_error () from /lib64/libc.so.6
ray-project#14 0x00007ffff7d5fb09 in _dlerror_run () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
ray-project#15 0x00007ffff7d5f42a in dlopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
ray-project#16 0x00007fffef04d330 in py_dl_open (self=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>)
    at /tmp/python-build.20220507135524.257789/Python-3.7.11/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c:1369
```

The root cause is that when loading `_raylet.so`, `static DelayManager _delay_manager` is initialized and `RAY_LOG(ERROR) << "RAY_testing_asio_delay_us is set to " << delay_env;` is executed. However, the static variables declared in `logging.cc` are not initialized yet (in this case, `std::string RayLog::logger_name_ = "ray_log_sink"`).

It's better not to rely on the initialization order of static variables in different compilation units because it's not guaranteed. I propose to change all `RAY_LOG`s to `std::cerr` in `DelayManager::Init()`.

The crash happens in Ant's internal codebase. Not sure why this test case passes in the community version though.

BTW, I've tried different approaches:

1. Using a static local variable in `get_delay_us` and remove the global variable. This doesn't work because `init()` needs to access the variable as well.
2. Defining the global variable as type `std::unique_ptr<DelayManager>` and initialize it in `get_delay_us`. This works but it requires a lock to be thread-safe. 

Signed-off-by: Rohan138 <rapotdar@purdue.edu>
Stefan-1313 pushed a commit to Stefan-1313/ray_mod that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2022
We encountered SIGSEGV when running Python test `python/ray/tests/test_failure_2.py::test_list_named_actors_timeout`. The stack is:

```
#0  0x00007fffed30f393 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) ()
   from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6
ray-project#1  0x00007fffee707649 in ray::RayLog::GetLoggerName() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
ray-project#2  0x00007fffee70aa90 in ray::SpdLogMessage::Flush() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
ray-project#3  0x00007fffee70af28 in ray::RayLog::~RayLog() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
ray-project#4  0x00007fffee2b570d in ray::asio::testing::(anonymous namespace)::DelayManager::Init() [clone .constprop.0] ()
   from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
ray-project#5  0x00007fffedd0d95a in _GLOBAL__sub_I_asio_chaos.cc () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so
ray-project#6  0x00007ffff7fe282a in call_init.part () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
ray-project#7  0x00007ffff7fe2931 in _dl_init () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
ray-project#8  0x00007ffff7fe674c in dl_open_worker () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
ray-project#9  0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6
ray-project#10 0x00007ffff7fe5ffe in _dl_open () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
ray-project#11 0x00007ffff7d5f39c in dlopen_doit () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
ray-project#12 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6
ray-project#13 0x00007ffff7b82f13 in _dl_catch_error () from /lib64/libc.so.6
ray-project#14 0x00007ffff7d5fb09 in _dlerror_run () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
ray-project#15 0x00007ffff7d5f42a in dlopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 () from /lib64/libdl.so.2
ray-project#16 0x00007fffef04d330 in py_dl_open (self=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>)
    at /tmp/python-build.20220507135524.257789/Python-3.7.11/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c:1369
```

The root cause is that when loading `_raylet.so`, `static DelayManager _delay_manager` is initialized and `RAY_LOG(ERROR) << "RAY_testing_asio_delay_us is set to " << delay_env;` is executed. However, the static variables declared in `logging.cc` are not initialized yet (in this case, `std::string RayLog::logger_name_ = "ray_log_sink"`).

It's better not to rely on the initialization order of static variables in different compilation units because it's not guaranteed. I propose to change all `RAY_LOG`s to `std::cerr` in `DelayManager::Init()`.

The crash happens in Ant's internal codebase. Not sure why this test case passes in the community version though.

BTW, I've tried different approaches:

1. Using a static local variable in `get_delay_us` and remove the global variable. This doesn't work because `init()` needs to access the variable as well.
2. Defining the global variable as type `std::unique_ptr<DelayManager>` and initialize it in `get_delay_us`. This works but it requires a lock to be thread-safe.

Signed-off-by: Stefan van der Kleij <s.vanderkleij@viroteq.com>
jaewan added a commit to jaewan/ray_memory_management that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2022
* blocktask and evict tasks separated

* blocktasks when oom

* command to replay the bug

* Fix crash in raylet on duplicate object

* Fixed bug in blocktasks. Did not block when block task called only

* Merged blocktasks and evicttasks into a single callback and erased evict callback

* get lowest pri, but obj does not have pri yet

* debug logs to see where to put priority

* log without compile error

* commit for migration

* working version. But still need testing

* Blocktasks but 2 new problems emerged

* added microbechmark

* deadlock cases 1 and 2 induced by not spilling. 1 is when workers are stuck with producers and 2 is when consumers are dependent on multiple objects

* polished debug messages

* typo fix

* removed scripts and included block, evict threshold triggered code

* changed get_lowest_pri to prevent a potential seg fault

* polished calling block_task callback

* modified flags to bool for readability and added a screening to avoid calling taskblock callback twice

* changed object_block callback function's arguments back to bool

* fixed unchanged function argument for the blockTask callback

* typo fix

Co-authored-by: Stephanie Wang <swang@cs.berkeley.edu>
Co-authored-by: Ubuntu <ubuntu@ip-172-31-62-69.us-west-2.compute.internal>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants