Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Have the Rule protocol define its members as non-static so that we ca… #11

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 19, 2015

Conversation

aarondaub
Copy link

…n pass around instances of Rule

@jpsim

@aarondaub
Copy link
Author

This addresses my issue #8. I believe it is necessary to make a fix for #3 (and later #4) possible.

@jpsim
Copy link
Collaborator

jpsim commented May 19, 2015

I agree that being able to pass around rule instances will make passing them around much simpler.

Could you add an entry to CHANGELOG.md? Otherwise this looks good.

@aarondaub
Copy link
Author

@jpsim how do you want to handle merging? Should we squash the commits?

jpsim added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2015
Define Rule protocol's members as non-static
@jpsim jpsim merged commit ed5b0b5 into realm:master May 19, 2015
@jpsim
Copy link
Collaborator

jpsim commented May 19, 2015

Merged. For future notice, please add changelog entries as I did here: a196c6a

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants