is JRuby supported? #30782
-
What would you like help with?I think I found a bug How are you running Renovate?Self-hosted If you're self-hosting Renovate, tell us which platform (GitHub, GitLab, etc) and which version of Renovate.github Please tell us more about your question or problemhttps://docs.renovatebot.com/ruby/ definitely implies that Ruby is supported, but doesn't give a lot of detail about what versions of Ruby are supported. Ruby as a language actually has several underlying implemenation options (called "platforms") and often it's very important that the We're seeing issues where Renovate seems to decide to run its own platform, rather than the one specified in our https://github.com/elastic/crawler/blob/5b1f14450fb7a38f9424aa37511648962f8ed85a/Gemfile#L36 ![]() ![]() On a local checkout, running
I expect that Renovate is just using MRI (C) Ruby. Logs (if relevant)Logs
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Hi there, A maintainer reviewed the information, and decided that this is not a bug. To avoid confusing others, we will close this Discussion. Please keep reading as there is good news too! The good news is that the maintainer likes your idea, in general. Please create a new Suggest an Idea Discussion. Feel free to copy/paste what you need from this Discussion. Please focus on the feature request: explain what Renovate should do, and how Renovate can know when/what to do. We may convert that Discussion to an Issue when it is ready. Note that you will still have to wait for a maintainer, or someone else, to do the work needed for your feature. Why are we closing your Discussion? For us, bug reports are about things that are not working as intended, or things that are not working as described in the docs. What you found may be bad behavior, but we do not think it is a bug. For more details, please read our development docs about bug handling. Thanks, the Renovate team |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
If JRuby was expected to work, it would have been a bug. :) Sounds like it's not necessarily expected to work.
I've created #30788.