Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to jump to a specific frame/timestamp in the timeline view #7653

Open
teh-cmc opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Ability to jump to a specific frame/timestamp in the timeline view #7653

teh-cmc opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
😤 annoying Something in the UI / SDK is annoying to use enhancement New feature or request ui concerns graphical user interface

Comments

@teh-cmc
Copy link
Member

teh-cmc commented Oct 9, 2024

I'm trying to jump to frame #15000. The frame label should be editable and let me enter the exact value I want to go to.
image

Existing workaround:

  1. use the time cursor to get close to the target
  2. use arrow keys to reach the target exactly
@teh-cmc teh-cmc added enhancement New feature or request ui concerns graphical user interface 😤 annoying Something in the UI / SDK is annoying to use labels Oct 9, 2024
@emilk emilk self-assigned this Oct 10, 2024
emilk added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 10, 2024
### What
* Part of #7653

I only implemented it for sequence timelines for now, since I didn't
want to parse timestamps in different formats this early in the morning.
Hopefully this can still help @teh-cmc.

It also shows how to do it for temporal timelines if someone wants to
follow my lead.


![precise-time-control](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2577a551-5ce2-4f18-a396-37c4488998a9)

### Checklist
* [x] I have read and agree to [Contributor
Guide](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and
the [Code of
Conduct](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
* [x] I've included a screenshot or gif (if applicable)
* [x] I have tested the web demo (if applicable):
* Using examples from latest `main` build:
[rerun.io/viewer](https://rerun.io/viewer/pr/7673?manifest_url=https://app.rerun.io/version/main/examples_manifest.json)
* Using full set of examples from `nightly` build:
[rerun.io/viewer](https://rerun.io/viewer/pr/7673?manifest_url=https://app.rerun.io/version/nightly/examples_manifest.json)
* [x] The PR title and labels are set such as to maximize their
usefulness for the next release's CHANGELOG
* [x] If applicable, add a new check to the [release
checklist](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/tests/python/release_checklist)!
* [x] If have noted any breaking changes to the log API in
`CHANGELOG.md` and the migration guide

- [PR Build Summary](https://build.rerun.io/pr/7673)
- [Recent benchmark results](https://build.rerun.io/graphs/crates.html)
- [Wasm size tracking](https://build.rerun.io/graphs/sizes.html)

To run all checks from `main`, comment on the PR with `@rerun-bot
full-check`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
😤 annoying Something in the UI / SDK is annoying to use enhancement New feature or request ui concerns graphical user interface
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants