Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Version lock griffe to 0.39 and fix some doc errors #4835

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jleibs
Copy link
Member

@jleibs jleibs commented Jan 17, 2024

What

PRs for our doc tests started failing spuriously as griffe 0.39 was rolled out to github runners. A non-expected spontaneous upgrade to griffe is bad in general, so I added it to the requirements-doc.

However, the failure is actually a valid warning about a non-conformant docstring so I fixed the error and kept us on 0.39 since the validation it does is actually useful and would be more obvious if you were introducing a new docstring.

Checklist

  • I have read and agree to Contributor Guide and the Code of Conduct
  • I've included a screenshot or gif (if applicable)
  • I have tested the web demo (if applicable):
  • The PR title and labels are set such as to maximize their usefulness for the next release's CHANGELOG

@jleibs jleibs added 📖 documentation Improvements or additions to documentation exclude from changelog PRs with this won't show up in CHANGELOG.md labels Jan 17, 2024
@jleibs jleibs changed the title Version lock griffe to 0.38.1 Version lock griffe to 0.39 and fix some doc errors Jan 17, 2024
@jleibs jleibs marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2024 00:53
Copy link
Member

@emilk emilk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Related: #2439

@emilk emilk merged commit a285868 into main Jan 17, 2024
41 of 43 checks passed
@emilk emilk deleted the jleibs/lock_griffe branch January 17, 2024 07:59
@Wumpf Wumpf added this to the 0.12.1 milestone Jan 17, 2024
emilk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
### What

PRs for our doc tests started failing spuriously as griffe 0.39 was
rolled out to github runners. A non-expected spontaneous upgrade to
griffe is bad in general, so I added it to the requirements-doc.

However, the failure is actually a valid warning about a non-conformant
docstring so I fixed the error and kept us on 0.39 since the validation
it does is actually useful and would be more obvious if you were
introducing a new docstring.

### Checklist
* [x] I have read and agree to [Contributor
Guide](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and
the [Code of
Conduct](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
* [x] I've included a screenshot or gif (if applicable)
* [x] I have tested the web demo (if applicable):
* Using newly built examples:
[app.rerun.io](https://app.rerun.io/pr/4835/index.html)
* Using examples from latest `main` build:
[app.rerun.io](https://app.rerun.io/pr/4835/index.html?manifest_url=https://app.rerun.io/version/main/examples_manifest.json)
* Using full set of examples from `nightly` build:
[app.rerun.io](https://app.rerun.io/pr/4835/index.html?manifest_url=https://app.rerun.io/version/nightly/examples_manifest.json)
* [x] The PR title and labels are set such as to maximize their
usefulness for the next release's CHANGELOG

- [PR Build Summary](https://build.rerun.io/pr/4835)
- [Docs
preview](https://rerun.io/preview/5e5cf8def0e884dd743718ce76b01e8d16a489b2/docs)
<!--DOCS-PREVIEW-->
- [Examples
preview](https://rerun.io/preview/5e5cf8def0e884dd743718ce76b01e8d16a489b2/examples)
<!--EXAMPLES-PREVIEW-->
- [Recent benchmark results](https://build.rerun.io/graphs/crates.html)
- [Wasm size tracking](https://build.rerun.io/graphs/sizes.html)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📖 documentation Improvements or additions to documentation exclude from changelog PRs with this won't show up in CHANGELOG.md
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants