-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add documentation for the contract version management solution #107
Conversation
9995380
to
1863554
Compare
multisig["RISC Zero Multisig"] | ||
appAdmin[App Admin] | ||
|
||
timelock -- admin --> router |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Curiosity: Are the terms admin, proposer, and guardian standard in smart contract development, or are those our terms?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Guardian I've seen before in this usage. Proposer is the name used in the TimelockController
interface. Admin is a term I chose for this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great!
Co-authored-by: Paul <paul.gafni@gmail.com>
…c0/risc0-ethereum into victor/version-management-design-doc
This PR adds documentation describing the design of the verifier contract version management solution implemented in #80. It is intended to provide detailed information to help security-minded application developers make an informed decision about how to use the verifier contracts.