-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: adding SubmitOptions to Submit #34
Conversation
WalkthroughA recent update in the codebase introduces Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #34 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 79.31% 79.77% +0.46%
==========================================
Files 3 3
Lines 174 178 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 138 142 +4
Misses 28 28
Partials 8 8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
types/pb/da/da.pb.go
is excluded by:!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (6)
- da.go (1 hunks)
- proto/da/da.proto (2 hunks)
- proxy/client.go (1 hunks)
- proxy/server.go (1 hunks)
- test/dummy.go (1 hunks)
- test/test_suite.go (5 hunks)
Additional comments: 10
da.go (3)
- 27-27: The
Submit
method has been updated to accept a pointer toSubmitOptions
instead of agasPrice
. Ensure all implementations of theDA
interface are updated accordingly.- 34-37: The
SubmitOptions
struct has been introduced with aGasPrice
and aNamespace
. Ensure that theNamespace
is being used appropriately whereverSubmitOptions
is instantiated.- 39-41: The
Namespace
type is defined as a byte slice alias. Confirm that this type is used consistently across the codebase and that its usage aligns with the intended design for namespaces.Verification successful
The
Namespace
type is consistently used across the codebase, including in protocol buffer definitions, server and client logic, and test suites, aligning with the intended design for namespaces as described in the PR objectives.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of Namespace type to ensure consistency. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'Namespace($_)'Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of Namespace type across the codebase using ripgrep rg "Namespace"Length of output: 3413
proxy/server.go (1)
- 60-63: The
Submit
method inproxySrv
now usesSubmitOptions
to passGasPrice
andNamespace
. Ensure that theNamespace
field is being handled correctly by thetarget.Submit
method.Verification successful
The
Submit
method in bothda.go
andproxy/client.go
has been reviewed. TheSubmit
method inda.go
accepts aSubmitOptions
pointer, which includesGasPrice
andNamespace
. TheNamespace
is defined as a type alias for a byte slice, which is a common way to handle arbitrary data in Go, such as strings or binary data.In
proxy/client.go
, theSubmit
method constructs apbda.SubmitRequest
, which includes theGasPrice
andNamespace
. TheNamespace
is wrapped in apbda.Namespace
struct, which suggests that theNamespace
field is being correctly handled as part of theSubmitOptions
struct when making a gRPC call.Based on the provided code snippets, it can be concluded that the
Namespace
field within theSubmitOptions
struct is being correctly utilized in theSubmit
method implementations in bothda.go
andproxy/client.go
. TheproxySrv
struct'sSubmit
method, as seen in theproxy/server.go
file, is consistent with these implementations.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the target.Submit method to ensure it handles Namespace correctly. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func ($_ *$_) Submit($_, $_, &SubmitOptions{GasPrice: $_, Namespace: $_}) { $$$ }'Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of the Submit method to examine how it handles the Namespace field. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func ($_ *$_) Submit($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search to find any method that uses the SubmitOptions struct. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func ($_ *$_) $_($$$, &SubmitOptions{$$$}) { $$$ }'Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for the SubmitOptions struct in the Go files. rg 'SubmitOptions' --type goLength of output: 1015
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the implementation of the Submit method in da.go and proxy/client.go. cat da.go cat proxy/client.goLength of output: 5041
proxy/client.go (1)
- 92-96: The
Submit
function in theClient
type now accepts aSubmitOptions
struct pointer. Ensure that theNamespace
field is being correctly converted to the protobufNamespace
type.Verification successful
The conversion of the
Namespace
field from theSubmitOptions
struct to the protobufNamespace
type is correctly implemented in theproxy/client.go
file, as confirmed by the script output.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the conversion of Namespace to the protobuf Namespace type to ensure correctness. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'&pbda.Namespace{Value: $_.Namespace}'Length of output: 143
proto/da/da.proto (2)
- 26-28: A new
Namespace
message has been introduced. Verify that this message is being used correctly in allSubmitRequest
messages across the codebase.Verification successful
---
The search results indicate that the
SubmitRequest
message is defined in theproto/da/da.proto
file. However, the output does not provide the full context of theSubmitRequest
message definition, which is necessary to verify the correct usage of theNamespace
message within it.To ensure a thorough verification, we need to view the contents of the
SubmitRequest
message definition in theproto/da/da.proto
file.---
The output from the script confirms that the
SubmitRequest
message in theproto/da/da.proto
file includes theNamespace
field as intended. TheNamespace
message is correctly used within theSubmitRequest
message definition, as shown by the lineNamespace namespace = 3;
.Based on this information, the review comment regarding the verification of the
Namespace
message being used correctly in allSubmitRequest
messages across the codebase is addressed, and the usage is confirmed to be correct in theproto/da/da.proto
file.* 93-93: The `SubmitRequest` message now includes a `Namespace` field. Confirm that all `SubmitRequest` messages are being constructed with the `Namespace` field where required.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of Namespace message in SubmitRequest messages. ast-grep --lang proto --pattern $'SubmitRequest { $$$ Namespace $_ $$$ }'Length of output: 185
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Since ast-grep does not support proto files, we will use ripgrep to search for the usage of Namespace message in SubmitRequest messages. rg 'SubmitRequest' --type protoLength of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Adjusting the search to find instances of SubmitRequest without specifying file type, as 'proto' is not recognized by ripgrep. rg 'SubmitRequest' -g '*.proto'Length of output: 228
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the contents of the SubmitRequest message definition in the da.proto file. rg 'message SubmitRequest {.*}' -A 10 -g 'proto/da/da.proto'Length of output: 192
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correcting the regex pattern to match the SubmitRequest message definition in the da.proto file. rg 'message SubmitRequest' -A 10 -g 'proto/da/da.proto'Length of output: 498
Verification successful
The provided script outputs show the construction of
SubmitRequest
messages in bothproxy/server.go
andproxy/client.go
. In both instances, theNamespace
field is being set:
- In
proxy/server.go
, theNamespace
field is set withrequest.Namespace.GetValue()
.- In
proxy/client.go
, theNamespace
field is set with&pbda.Namespace{Value: opts.Namespace}
.This confirms that the
Namespace
field is being included in the construction ofSubmitRequest
messages where required, as per the changes in theproto/da/da.proto
file.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the construction of SubmitRequest messages to ensure the Namespace field is included. ast-grep --lang proto --pattern $'SubmitRequest { $$$ Namespace: $_ $$$ }'Length of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the construction of SubmitRequest messages to ensure the Namespace field is included. rg 'SubmitRequest.*namespace'Length of output: 31
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search to find any instances of SubmitRequest being constructed. rg 'SubmitRequest'Length of output: 3055
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the relevant sections from proxy/server.go and proxy/client.go where SubmitRequest is being constructed. rg -C 10 'SubmitRequest' proxy/server.go rg -C 10 'SubmitRequest' proxy/client.goLength of output: 1241
test/dummy.go (1)
- 103-103: The
Submit
function inDummyDA
now accepts aSubmitOptions
struct pointer. Ensure that theopts
parameter is being used correctly within the function.test/test_suite.go (2)
- 32-56: The test functions have been updated to use
SubmitOptions
when callingSubmit
. Verify that theNamespace
field is being set correctly in all test cases.Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed that the
Namespace
field is being set correctly in all test cases withintest/test_suite.go
. TheNamespace
is consistently set to the byte slice[]byte{9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0}
in each instance whereSubmitOptions
is used.* 164-181: > 📝 **NOTE** > This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [158-178]Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the setting of Namespace field in test cases. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'&da.SubmitOptions{GasPrice: $_, Namespace: $_}'Length of output: 1506
The
ConcurrentReadWriteTest
function is designed to test for race conditions. Ensure that theDummyDA
implementation is thread-safe and that the test is effective in detecting concurrency issues.
Closes #33
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
SubmitOptions
struct to provide additional configuration for blob submissions.Namespace
for blob submissions.Refactor
Submit
method signatures across multiple components to use the newSubmitOptions
struct.proxySrv
logic to accommodate the changes in submission options.Tests
SubmitOptions
.