Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Dashing] backport rclcpp_components_register_node #935

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 5, 2019

Conversation

sloretz
Copy link
Contributor

@sloretz sloretz commented Dec 5, 2019

Backport #784, #790, #795 to Dashing for the CMake macro rclcpp_components_register_node. These 3 PRs are everything in the history of rclcpp_components_register_node.cmake.

https://github.com/ros2/rclcpp/commits/eloquent/rclcpp_components/cmake/rclcpp_components_register_node.cmake

*cmake macro to create components for libraries with multiple nodes

Signed-off-by: Siddharth Kucheria <kucheria@usc.edu>
Signed-off-by: Shane Loretz <sloretz@openrobotics.org>
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Kucheria <kucheria@usc.edu>
Signed-off-by: Shane Loretz <sloretz@openrobotics.org>
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Kucheria <kucheria@usc.edu>
Signed-off-by: Shane Loretz <sloretz@openrobotics.org>
@sloretz sloretz added the in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) label Dec 5, 2019
@sloretz sloretz self-assigned this Dec 5, 2019
@mjcarroll
Copy link
Member

Just as a sanity check, are you going to backport all of the demo/example updates for components or just this functionality?

@sloretz
Copy link
Contributor Author

sloretz commented Dec 5, 2019

Just as a sanity check, are you going to backport all of the demo/example updates for components or just this functionality?

Just this functionality. I'm using it in a WIP pcl_ros port for eloquent, but I'd like to build against dashing.

@sloretz sloretz added the in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) label Dec 5, 2019
@sloretz
Copy link
Contributor Author

sloretz commented Dec 5, 2019

Moved to in review since I tested this backport works for me in a dashing workspace

CI (dashing, testing just rclcpp)

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@sloretz sloretz removed the in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) label Dec 5, 2019
@sloretz
Copy link
Contributor Author

sloretz commented Dec 5, 2019

Merging, will address #935 (comment) in a new PR

@sloretz sloretz merged commit 0f4fc08 into dashing Dec 5, 2019
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the dashing_backport_register_node branch December 5, 2019 17:48
nnmm pushed a commit to ApexAI/rclcpp that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2022
* test should check specified number of entities.

Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com>

* rename function name to be very explicit about the point of the check.

Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com>

* remove check_graph_state().

Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com>
DensoADAS pushed a commit to DensoADAS/rclcpp that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2022
…rClock (ros2#935)

* Remove JumpHandler copy-implementation from PlayerClock/TimeControllerClock

This API was originally envisioned as a way to handle the `seek`/`jump` operation, but that feature ended up being implemented inline in the `Player`. This is not used now, and I do not anticipate using it in the future. Removing as housekeeping - if it is needed later it can always be re-added from history.

Signed-off-by: Emerson Knapp <emerson.b.knapp@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in review Waiting for review (Kanban column)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants