You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Interestingly, Heuristica-Bold.woff is also damaged, but the two italic versions seem fine.
Additionally, the page style declares Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif as fallbacks. Since Heuristica is a serif font, shouldn't we use serif fallbacks? (That said, the docs look fine with the sans fonts to me, I wouldn't mind keeping the current looks.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
- Treat WOFF as binary files so that git does not perform newline normalization.
- Replace corrupt Heuristica files with Source Serif Pro — italics are [almost in production](adobe-fonts/source-serif#2) so I left Heuristica Italic which makes a good pair with SSP. Overall, Source Serif Pro is I think a better fit for rustdoc (cc @thehydroimpulse). This ought to fix#15527.
- Store Source Code Pro locally in order to make offline docs freestanding. Fixes#14778.
Preview: http://adrientetar.legtux.org/cached/rust-docs/core.html
r? @alexcrichton
The documentation pages are supposed to use a serif font named Heuristica for body text, but all browsers tested failed to render it.
Most browsers were silent, but Firefox gave me these two helpful console messages:
Interestingly, Heuristica-Bold.woff is also damaged, but the two italic versions seem fine.
Additionally, the page style declares Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif as fallbacks. Since Heuristica is a serif font, shouldn't we use serif fallbacks? (That said, the docs look fine with the sans fonts to me, I wouldn't mind keeping the current looks.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: