Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make param index generation a bit more robust #103475

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2022

Conversation

oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Oct 24, 2022

r? @lcnr

While not really necessary for closure and anon const ids, it's strictly more correct

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 24, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 24, 2022
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Oct 24, 2022

@bors r=lcnr

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2022

📌 Commit b6824ba has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 24, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2022
Make param index generation a bit more robust

r? `@lcnr`

While not really necessary for closure and anon const ids, it's strictly more correct
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2022
Make param index generation a bit more robust

r? ``@lcnr``

While not really necessary for closure and anon const ids, it's strictly more correct
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2022
Make param index generation a bit more robust

r? ```@lcnr```

While not really necessary for closure and anon const ids, it's strictly more correct
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103035 (Even nicer errors from assert_unsafe_precondition)
 - rust-lang#103106 (Try to say that memory outside the AM is always exposed)
 - rust-lang#103475 (Make param index generation a bit more robust)
 - rust-lang#103525 (Move a wf-check into the site where the value is instantiated)
 - rust-lang#103564 (library: allow some unused things in Miri)
 - rust-lang#103586 (Process registered region obligation in `resolve_regions_with_wf_tys`)
 - rust-lang#103592 (rustdoc: remove redundant CSS selector `.notable-traits .notable`)
 - rust-lang#103593 (Remove an unused parser function (`Expr::returns`))
 - rust-lang#103611 (Add test for issue 103574)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit d7ad6ad into rust-lang:master Oct 27, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants