Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #103617

Closed
wants to merge 18 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

cjgillot and others added 18 commits October 23, 2022 19:36
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
The margin was already being set to 0 only a few lines lower.
…n3, r=thomcc

Even nicer errors from assert_unsafe_precondition

For example, now running `cargo test` with this patch I get things like:
```
$ cargo +stage1 test
    Finished test [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.01s
     Running unittests src/lib.rs (target/debug/deps/malloc_buf-9d105ddf86862995)

running 5 tests
thread 'tests::test_null_buf' panicked at 'unsafe precondition violated: is_aligned_and_not_null(data) &&
    crate::mem::size_of::<T>().saturating_mul(len) <= isize::MAX as usize', /home/ben/rust/library/core/src/slice/raw.rs:93:9
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
thread panicked while panicking. aborting.
error: test failed, to rerun pass `--lib`

Caused by:
  process didn't exit successfully: `/tmp/malloc_buf-1.0.0/target/debug/deps/malloc_buf-9d105ddf86862995` (signal: 6, SIGABRT: process abort signal)
```

This is still not perfect, but these are better for another PR:
* `stringify!` is trying to do clever pretty-printing on the `expr` inside `assert_unsafe_precondition` and can even add a newline.
* It would be nice to print a bit more information about where the problem is. Perhaps this is `cfg_attr(debug_assertions, track_caller)`, or perhaps it the function name added to `Location`.

cc `@RalfJung` this is what I was thinking of for rust-lang#102732 (comment)
Try to say that memory outside the AM is always exposed

cc `@Gankra` `@thomcc`

I want to confidently tell people that they can use `from_exposed_addr` to get a pointer for doing MMIO and/or other hardware interactions done with volatile reads/writes at particular addresses outside the Rust AM. Currently, the docs indicate that would be UB.

With this change, now the docs indicate that this is intended to be a valid use of `from_exposed_addr`.

r? `@RalfJung`
…er-errors

Do not consider repeated lifetime params for elision.

Fixes rust-lang#103330
Make param index generation a bit more robust

r? ```@lcnr```

While not really necessary for closure and anon const ids, it's strictly more correct
…ait, r=lcnr

Move a wf-check into the site where the value is instantiated

r? `@lcnr`
…ckh726

Process registered region obligation in `resolve_regions_with_wf_tys`

Fixes rust-lang#103573
…-notable, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: remove redundant CSS selector `.notable-traits .notable`

The margin was already being set to 0 only a few lines lower.
@rustbot rustbot added A-translation Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Oct 27, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 27, 2022

📌 Commit 30fc2a4 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 27, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 27, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 30fc2a4 with merge 64f804c14cd75977747ced46507beab68f0c7c35...

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Oct 27, 2022

@bors r-
#103450 breaks 1k crates on crater

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 27, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-xzue03w branch December 22, 2022 10:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-translation Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants