Fix some misleading target feature aliases #103750
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc cc @antoyo |
workingjubilee
requested changes
Nov 12, 2022
Comment on lines
+318
to
+321
| adx, aes, avx, avx2, avx512bf16, avx512bitalg, avx512bw, avx512cd, avx512dq, avx512er, avx512f, avx512ifma, | ||
| avx512pf, avx512vbmi, avx512vbmi2, avx512vl, avx512vnni, avx512vp2intersect, avx512vpopcntdq, | ||
| bmi1, bmi2, cmpxchg16b, ermsb, f16c, fma, fxsr, gfni, lzcnt, movbe, pclmulqdq, popcnt, rdrand, rdseed, rtm, | ||
| sha, sse, sse2, sse3, sse4.1, sse4.2, sse4a, ssse3, tbm, vaes, vpclmulqdq, xsave, xsavec, xsaveopt, xsaves |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I feel almost like these should be sorted by theme rather than alphabetical, but that can happen some other day.
| @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ const X86_ALLOWED_FEATURES: &[(&str, Option<Symbol>)] = &[ | |||
| ("f16c", Some(sym::f16c_target_feature)), | |||
| ("fma", None), | |||
| ("fxsr", None), | |||
| ("gfni", Some(sym::avx512_target_feature)), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's honestly kind of weird that this isn't prefixed v for vgfni like the other features.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it's because the v prefix implies VEX- or EVEX-encoded instructions (e.g. VGF2P8AFFINEQB), but GFNI also introduces plain SSE instructions (e.g. GF2P8AFFINEQB). This is the same distinction as PCLMULQDQ vs VPCLMULQDQ or AES vs VAES for example, but the difference there is the different encodings have separate CPUID flags, whereas GFNI has just one.
|
Looks good to me. @bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 2a7c3d02722704e96095a9d734d9db3bbe72ab56 has been approved by It is now in the queue for this repository. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Co-authored-by: Jubilee <46493976+workingjubilee@users.noreply.github.com>
calebzulawski
force-pushed
the
master
branch
from
336667f to
1122400
Compare
|
I accidentally synced my fork, didn't realize this PR was linked to my master branch. Not sure if you'll need to reapprove the rebased commits... |
|
@bors r+ |
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2022
…ilee Fix some misleading target feature aliases This is the first half of a fix for rust-lang#100752. It looks like these aliases were added in rust-lang#78361 and slipped under the radar, as these features are not AVX512. These features _do_ add AVX512 instructions when used _in combination_ with AVX512F, but without AVX512F, these features still provide 128-bit and 256-bit vector instructions. A user might be mislead into thinking these features imply AVX512F (which is true of the actual AVX512 features). This PR allows using the names as defined by LLVM, which matches Intel documentation. A future PR should change the `std::arch` intrinsics to use these names, and finally remove these aliases from rustc. r? `@workingjubilee` cc `@Amanieu`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2022
…ilee Fix some misleading target feature aliases This is the first half of a fix for rust-lang#100752. It looks like these aliases were added in rust-lang#78361 and slipped under the radar, as these features are not AVX512. These features _do_ add AVX512 instructions when used _in combination_ with AVX512F, but without AVX512F, these features still provide 128-bit and 256-bit vector instructions. A user might be mislead into thinking these features imply AVX512F (which is true of the actual AVX512 features). This PR allows using the names as defined by LLVM, which matches Intel documentation. A future PR should change the `std::arch` intrinsics to use these names, and finally remove these aliases from rustc. r? ``@workingjubilee`` cc ``@Amanieu``
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2022
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#103750 (Fix some misleading target feature aliases) - rust-lang#104137 (Issue error when -C link-self-contained option is used on unsupported platforms) - rust-lang#104317 (cleanup and dedupe CTFE and Miri error reporting) - rust-lang#104335 (Only do parser recovery on retried macro matching) - rust-lang#104394 (various cleanups to try to reduce the use of spans inside method resolution) - rust-lang#104459 (rustdoc: remove unused JS IIFE from main.js) - rust-lang#104462 (rustdoc: remove pointless CSS `.rightside { padding-right: 2px }`) - rust-lang#104466 (rustdoc: remove no-op CSS `#crate-search-div { display: inline-block }`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Merged
Aaron1011
pushed a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2023
…ilee Fix some misleading target feature aliases This is the first half of a fix for rust-lang#100752. It looks like these aliases were added in rust-lang#78361 and slipped under the radar, as these features are not AVX512. These features _do_ add AVX512 instructions when used _in combination_ with AVX512F, but without AVX512F, these features still provide 128-bit and 256-bit vector instructions. A user might be mislead into thinking these features imply AVX512F (which is true of the actual AVX512 features). This PR allows using the names as defined by LLVM, which matches Intel documentation. A future PR should change the `std::arch` intrinsics to use these names, and finally remove these aliases from rustc. r? ```@workingjubilee``` cc ```@Amanieu```
Aaron1011
pushed a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#103750 (Fix some misleading target feature aliases) - rust-lang#104137 (Issue error when -C link-self-contained option is used on unsupported platforms) - rust-lang#104317 (cleanup and dedupe CTFE and Miri error reporting) - rust-lang#104335 (Only do parser recovery on retried macro matching) - rust-lang#104394 (various cleanups to try to reduce the use of spans inside method resolution) - rust-lang#104459 (rustdoc: remove unused JS IIFE from main.js) - rust-lang#104462 (rustdoc: remove pointless CSS `.rightside { padding-right: 2px }`) - rust-lang#104466 (rustdoc: remove no-op CSS `#crate-search-div { display: inline-block }`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2023
…nieu Remove misleading target feature aliases Fixes rust-lang#100752. This is a follow up to rust-lang#103750. These aliases could not be completely removed until rust-lang/stdarch#1355 landed. cc `@Amanieu`
antoyo
pushed a commit
to antoyo/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2023
…ilee Fix some misleading target feature aliases This is the first half of a fix for rust-lang#100752. It looks like these aliases were added in rust-lang#78361 and slipped under the radar, as these features are not AVX512. These features _do_ add AVX512 instructions when used _in combination_ with AVX512F, but without AVX512F, these features still provide 128-bit and 256-bit vector instructions. A user might be mislead into thinking these features imply AVX512F (which is true of the actual AVX512 features). This PR allows using the names as defined by LLVM, which matches Intel documentation. A future PR should change the `std::arch` intrinsics to use these names, and finally remove these aliases from rustc. r? ```@workingjubilee``` cc ```@Amanieu```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the first half of a fix for #100752. It looks like these aliases were added in #78361 and slipped under the radar, as these features are not AVX512. These features do add AVX512 instructions when used in combination with AVX512F, but without AVX512F, these features still provide 128-bit and 256-bit vector instructions. A user might be mislead into thinking these features imply AVX512F (which is true of the actual AVX512 features). This PR allows using the names as defined by LLVM, which matches Intel documentation.
A future PR should change the
std::archintrinsics to use these names, and finally remove these aliases from rustc.r? @workingjubilee
cc @Amanieu