Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #104179

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Nov 9, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 7 pull requests #104179

merged 19 commits into from
Nov 9, 2022

Conversation

Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

chenyukang and others added 19 commits October 25, 2022 21:16
This is basically is ripoff of src/test/ui/simd/target-feature-mixup.rs
but for floats and without #[repr(simd)]
Users report an AV at runtime of the compiled binary when using lld and
ThinLTO on windows-msvc. The AV occurs when accessing a static value
which is defined in one crate but used in another. Based on the
disassembly of the cross-crate use, it appears that the use is not
correctly linked with the definition and is instead assigned a garbage
pointer value.

If we look at the symbol tables for each crates' obj file, we can see
what is happening:

*lib.obj*:

```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
00E 00000000 SECT2  notype       External     | _ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```

*bin.obj*:

```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
010 00000000 UNDEF  notype       External     | __imp__ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```

The use of the symbol has the "import" style symbol name but the
declaration doesn't generate any symbol with the same name. As a result,
linking the files generates a warning from lld:

> rust-lld: warning: bin.obj: locally defined symbol imported: reproducer::memrchr::FN::h612b61ca0e168901 (defined in lib.obj) [LNK4217]

and the symbol reference remains undefined at runtime leading to the AV.

To fix this, we just need to detect that we are performing ThinLTO (and
thus, static linking) and omit the `dllimport` attribute on the extern
item in LLVM IR.
This helps with `*-windows-gnullvm` targets
Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: David Wood <agile.lion3441@fuligin.ink>
…d, r=nikomatsakis

avoid making substs of type aliases late bound when used as fn args

fixes rust-lang#47511
fixes rust-lang#85533
(although I did not know theses issues existed when i was working on this 🙃)

currently `Alias<...>` is treated the same as `Struct<...>` when deciding if generics should be late bound or early bound but this is not correct as `Alias` might normalize to a projection which does not constrain the generics.

I think this needs more tests before merging
more explanation of PR [here](https://hackmd.io/v44a-QVjTIqqhK9uretyQg?view)

Hackmd inline for future readers:
---

This assumes reader is familiar with the concept of early/late bound lifetimes. There's a section on rustc-dev-guide if not (although i think some details are a bit out of date)

## problem & background

Not all lifetimes on a fn can be late bound:
```rust
fn foo<'a>() -> &'a ();
impl<'a> Fn<()> for FooFnDef {
    type Output = &'a (); // uh oh unconstrained lifetime
}
```
so we make make them early bound
```rust
fn foo<'a>() -> &'a ();
impl<'a> Fn<()> for FooFnDef<'a> {// wow look at all that lifetimey
     type Output = &'a ();
}
```
(Closures have the same constraint however it is not enforced leading to soundness bugs, [rust-lang#84385](rust-lang#84385) implements this "downgrading late bound to early bound" for closures)

lifetimes on fn items are only late bound when they are "constrained" by the fn args:
```rust
fn foo<'a>(_: &'a ()) -> &'a ();
//               late bound, not present on `FooFnItem`
//               vv
impl<'a> Trait<(&'a (),)> for FooFnItem {
    type Output = &'a ();
}

// projections do not constrain inputs
fn bar<'a, T: Trait>(_: <T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc) -> &'a (); //  early bound
                                                            //  vv
impl<'a, T: Trait> Fn<(<T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc,)> for BarFnItem<'a, T> {
    type Output = &'a ();
}
```

current logic for determining if inputs "constrain" a lifetime works off of HIR so does not normalize aliases. It also assumes that any path with no self type constrains all its substs (i.e. `Foo<'a, u32>` has no self type but `T::Assoc` does). This falls apart for top level type aliases (see linked issues):

```rust
type Alias<'a, T> = <T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc;
//                      wow look its a path with no self type uwu
//                      i bet that constrains `'a` so it should be latebound
//                      vvvvvvvvvvv
fn foo<'a, T: Trait>(_: Alias<'a, T>) -> &'a ();
//                     `Alias` normalized to make things clearer
//                     vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
impl<'a, T: Trait> Fn<(<T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc,)> for FooFnDef<T> {
    type Output = &'a ();
    // oh no `'a` isnt constrained wah wah waaaah *trumbone noises*
    // i think, idk what musical instrument that is
}
```

## solution

The PR solves this by having the hir visitor that checks for lifetimes in constraining uses check if the path is a `DefKind::Alias`. If it is we ""normalize"" it by calling `type_of` and walking the returned type. This is a bit hacky as it requires a mapping between the substs on the path in hir, and the generics of the `type Alias<...>` which is on the ty layer.

Alternative solutions may involve calculating the "late boundness" of lifetimes after/during astconv rather than relying on hir at all. We already have code to determine whether a lifetime SHOULD be late bound or not as this is currently how the error for `fn foo<'a, T: Trait>(_: Alias<'a, T>) -> &'a ();` gets emitted.

It is probably not possible to do this right now, late boundness is used by `generics_of` and `gather_explicit_predicates_of` as we currently do not put late bound lifetimes in `Generics`. Although this seems sus to me as the long term goal is to make all generics late bound which would result in `generics_of(function)` being empty? [rust-lang#103448](rust-lang#103448) places all lifetimes in `Generics` regardless of late boundness so that may be a good step towards making this possible.
…ts, r=Amanieu

Test that target feature mix up with homogeneous floats is sound

This pull-request adds a test in `src/test/abi/` that test that target feature mix up with homogeneous floats is sound.

This is basically is ripoff of [src/test/ui/simd/target-feature-mixup.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/47d1cdb0bcac8e417071ce1929d261efe2399ae2/src/test/ui/simd/target-feature-mixup.rs) but for floats and without `#[repr(simd)]`.

*Extracted from rust-lang#97559 since I don't yet know what to do with that PR.*
…r=michaelwoerister

Fix Access Violation when using lld & ThinLTO on windows-msvc

Users report an AV at runtime of the compiled binary when using lld and ThinLTO on windows-msvc. The AV occurs when accessing a static value which is defined in one crate but used in another. Based on the disassembly of the cross-crate use, it appears that the use is not correctly linked with the definition and is instead assigned a garbage pointer value.

If we look at the symbol tables for each crates' obj file, we can see what is happening:

*lib.obj*:

```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
00E 00000000 SECT2  notype       External     | _ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```

*bin.obj*:

```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
010 00000000 UNDEF  notype       External     | __imp__ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```

The use of the symbol has the "import" style symbol name but the declaration doesn't generate any symbol with the same name. As a result, linking the files generates a warning from lld:

> rust-lld: warning: bin.obj: locally defined symbol imported: reproducer::memrchr::FN::h612b61ca0e168901 (defined in lib.obj) [LNK4217]

and the symbol reference remains undefined at runtime leading to the AV.

To fix this, we just need to detect that we are performing ThinLTO (and thus, static linking) and omit the `dllimport` attribute on the extern item in LLVM IR.

Fixes rust-lang#81408
…-hang, r=jackh726,wesleywiser

Avoid possible infinite  loop when next_point reaching the end of file

Fixes rust-lang#103451
If we return a span with `lo` = `hi`, `span_to_snippet` will always get `Ok("")`, which may introduce infinite loop if we don't care.

This PR make `find_width_of_character_at_span` return `width` with 1, so that `span_to_snippet` will get an `Err`.
first move on a nested span_label

trying not to be smart this time.
…crum

Update several crates for improved support of the new targets

This helps with `*-windows-gnullvm` targets by reducing amount of patching.
…at, r=wesleywiser

Properly remap and check for substs compatibility in `confirm_impl_trait_in_trait_candidate`

Fixes rust-lang#103824
@rustbot rustbot added T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) A-translation Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Nov 9, 2022
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 9, 2022

📌 Commit 6c021cf has been approved by Manishearth

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 9, 2022
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

@bors p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 9, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 6c021cf with merge 91385d5...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 9, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Manishearth
Pushing 91385d5 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 9, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 91385d5 into rust-lang:master Nov 9, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 9, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#103827 4d59c7c2a227ea841a55690eda1e30f695618b2d
#103778 07e76993c4288d7f7f376729ee5498d6c6b5fcdd
#103559 302cc47c908475bbb59799038c09084eceb1fff7
#103521 26f378448561f66f2c543c8b211b984df4206dc6
#103353 75224712c37a4bef3e9052f72cd4fa281ba9787a
#101381 2788700e581f3e6ca27bfa455d79ff29ff765362
#100508 3a3eb6fa25ec6b9ebfa662be01f60785253a55de

previous master: bc2504a83c

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (91385d5): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.4% [2.4%, 2.4%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.4% [2.0%, 2.8%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.7% [-3.7%, -3.7%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.4% [2.4%, 2.4%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-translation Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.