Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 6 pull requests #105122

Closed
wants to merge 16 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

flba-eb and others added 16 commits November 28, 2022 08:11
This removes the need to maintain a list of all other
OSs which ignore the tests.
DIV tags have block display by default. It is from when this rule
used to target a SPAN tag, but became redundant in
4bd6748.
`#![custom_mir]`: Various improvements

This PR makes a bunch of improvements to `#![custom_mir]`. Ideally this would be 4 PRs, one for each commit, but those would take forever to get merged and be a pain to juggle. Should still be reviewed one commit at a time though.

### Commit 1: Support arbitrary `let`

Before this change, all locals used in the body need to be declared at the top of the `mir!` invocation, which is rather annoying. We attempt to change that.

Unfortunately, we still have the requirement that the output of the `mir!` macro must resolve, typecheck, etc. Because of that, we can't just accept this in the THIR -> MIR parser because something like
```rust
{
    let x = 0;
    Goto(other)
}
other = {
    RET = x;
    Return()
}
```
will fail to resolve. Instead, the implementation does macro shenanigans to find the let declarations and extract them as part of the `mir!` macro. That *works*, but it is fairly complicated and degrades debuginfo by quite a bit. Specifically, the spans for any statements and declarations that are affected by this are completely wrong. My guess is that this is a net improvement though.

One way to recover some of the debuginfo would be to not support type annotations in the `let` statements, which would allow us to parse like `let $stmt:stmt`. That seems quite surprising though.

### Commit 2: Parse consts

Reuses most of the const parsing from regular Mir building for building custom mir

### Commit 3: Parse statics

Statics are slightly weird because the Mir primitive associated with them is a reference/pointer to them, so this is factored out separately.

### Commit 4: Fix some spans

A bunch of the spans were non-ideal, so we adjust them to be much more helpful.

r? `@oli-obk`
…acrum

Run Windows-only tests only on Windows

This removes the need to maintain an ignore-list of all other OSs.

See rust-lang#102305 for a similar change.
Extract llvm datalayout parsing out of spec module

fix rust-lang#103693 (comment)
…-div-desc, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: remove redundant CSS `div.desc { display: block }`

DIV tags have block display by default. It is from when this rule used to target a SPAN tag, but became redundant in 4bd6748.
Fix ICE from rust-lang#105101

Fixes rust-lang#105101

Rather than comparing idents, compare spans, which should be unique to each variant.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 1, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 1, 2022

📌 Commit e318732 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 1, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

ah there's already a rollup running, oops :P
@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 1, 2022
@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC closed this Dec 1, 2022
@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC deleted the rollup-o3c5egj branch December 1, 2022 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants