Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a type-alias-impl-trait in ObligationForest #107168

Conversation

Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 21, 2023

r? @oli-obk

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 21, 2023
@Noratrieb Noratrieb changed the title Use a type-alias-impl-train in ObligationForest Use a type-alias-impl-trait in ObligationForest Jan 21, 2023
@Noratrieb Noratrieb force-pushed the if-a-tait-falls-in-the-forest,can-we-know-it-wasnt-revealed branch from 144a0a6 to f74ca88 Compare January 21, 2023 19:14
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jan 21, 2023

@bors try @rust-timer queue

This stuff can be very perf sensitive

r=me with perf clean

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 21, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 21, 2023

⌛ Trying commit f74ca88 with merge d5379144f1180541fb6c6cfdeb24fbf689e2d3c4...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 21, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: d5379144f1180541fb6c6cfdeb24fbf689e2d3c4 (d5379144f1180541fb6c6cfdeb24fbf689e2d3c4)

1 similar comment
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 21, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: d5379144f1180541fb6c6cfdeb24fbf689e2d3c4 (d5379144f1180541fb6c6cfdeb24fbf689e2d3c4)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (d5379144f1180541fb6c6cfdeb24fbf689e2d3c4): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.3% [-0.3%, -0.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.9% [-5.0%, -0.8%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 22, 2023
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=oli-obk

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 22, 2023

📌 Commit f74ca88 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 22, 2023
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jan 26, 2023

@bors rollup=always

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2023
…orest,can-we-know-it-wasnt-revealed, r=oli-obk

Use a type-alias-impl-trait in `ObligationForest`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2023
…orest,can-we-know-it-wasnt-revealed, r=oli-obk

Use a type-alias-impl-trait in `ObligationForest`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#106904 (Preserve split DWARF files when building archives.)
 - rust-lang#106971 (Handle diagnostics customization on the fluent side (for one specific diagnostic))
 - rust-lang#106978 (Migrate mir_build's borrow conflicts)
 - rust-lang#107150 (`ty::tls` cleanups)
 - rust-lang#107168 (Use a type-alias-impl-trait in `ObligationForest`)
 - rust-lang#107189 (Encode info for Adt in a single place.)
 - rust-lang#107322 (Custom mir: Add support for some remaining, easy to support constructs)
 - rust-lang#107323 (Disable ConstGoto opt in cleanup blocks)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 3c145ff into rust-lang:master Jan 26, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Jan 26, 2023
@Noratrieb Noratrieb deleted the if-a-tait-falls-in-the-forest,can-we-know-it-wasnt-revealed branch January 26, 2023 20:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants