Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove ne implementations from strings #108660

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 4, 2023
Merged

Remove ne implementations from strings #108660

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 4, 2023

Conversation

KamilaBorowska
Copy link
Contributor

As far as I can tell, there isn't really a reason for those.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 2, 2023

r? @thomcc

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 2, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 2, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented Mar 3, 2023

Pretty sure we decided in a meeting that these aren't needed or desirable anymore, so

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 3, 2023

📌 Commit e248d0c has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 3, 2023
@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC mentioned this pull request Mar 4, 2023
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2023
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#108732 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-dy1l8sx, r=Dylan-DPC
276b75a 
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#108298 (Fix ICE: check if snippet is `)`)
 - rust-lang#108405 (Lazily compute crate name for consider_optimizing)
 - rust-lang#108656 (Rustdoc search: Emit an error for unclosed generic)
 - rust-lang#108660 (Remove ne implementations from strings)
 - rust-lang#108669 (Allow checking whether a type allows being uninitialized)
 - rust-lang#108727 (rustc_expand: make proc-macro derive error translatable)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e700d02 into rust-lang:master Mar 4, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Mar 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@thomcc thomcc

Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.69.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@KamilaBorowska @rustbot @thomcc @bors